The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425 · cited 2×
“Organizational capabilities reflect the firm's ability to deploy its resources in such a way that they create competitive advantage (Amit & Schoemaker, 1993; Day, 1994; Grant, 1996).”
BackgroundService-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“To increase the validity of the case study, we relied on triangulated data collection methods, which can overcome limitations and biases by counterbalancing them with the strengths of other data collection methods (Jick, 1979).”
MethodLaursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not
Suddaby, R. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020 · Cited by 2,859 · cited 1×
“Our research processwas abductive, which is amore useful research approach when a research project is geared towards discovery (Dubois & Gadde, 2014; Suddaby, 2006).”
Method
Cited by
on behalf of the GrandStand, S. S. A. T. G. O. T. M. R. G., Leask, C. F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D. A., Altenburg, T. M., Cardon, G., Chinapaw, M. J. M., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verloigne, M., & Chastin, S. F. M. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9 · Cited by 673
Testing the fluctuations of oil resource price volatility: A hurdle for economic recovery
Xiuzhen, X., Zheng, W., & Umair, M. (2022) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102982 · Cited by 407
The value of social media for innovation: A capability perspective
Muninger, M.-I., Hammedi, W., & Mahr, D. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.012 · Cited by 277
Self-citationZhou, S., Blazquez, M., McCormick, H., & Barnes, L. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.011 · Cited by 181
Project benefits co-creation: shaping sustainable development benefits
Keeys, L. A., & Huemann, M. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.008 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Kazadi, K., Lievens, A., & Mahr, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 525-540
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W632509482
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 54.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.009
- The paper
- Kazadi, K., Lievens, A., & Mahr, D. (2016). Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
