Cited by 344Technology Adoption and User BehaviourAugmented Reality ApplicationsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: A closer look at privacy risks

Rauschnabel, Philipp A., He, Jun, Ro, Young K.·2018·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.008

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data protection research has typically focused on the protection of a user's privacy; since Augmented Reality must track and understand the real world, it also affects the privacy of other people.

    “Finally, Rauschnabel et al. (2018) discuss that data protection research has typically focused on the protection of a user's privacy.Since AR must by definition track and understand the real world, this also affects the privacy of other people.”
  • AR can strengthen confidence in choice and willingness to pay by simulating tangibility and enabling virtual product testing, reducing online purchase uncertainty.

    “In digital retailing, AR can strengthen both judgements by simulating tangibility and enabling virtual product testing, which reduces the uncertainty that ordinarily attends online purchases (Rauschnabel et al. 2018;Scholz and Duffy 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rauschnabel, P. A., He, J., & Ro, Y. K.
Affiliations
  • Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
  • University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
Corresponding author
Rauschnabel, Philipp A.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
92
Pages
374-384
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888120430
Cited by
344
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
42.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Purdue University
  • University of Michigan
  • Tsinghua University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
augmented reality smart glasses, wearable technology adoption, privacy risks, perceived benefits, utilitarian benefits, hedonic benefits, symbolic benefits, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review