Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy

Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi, Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen·2021·Journal of Business Research

Abstract

Abstract The unprecedented interactivity of social media has empowered social media influencers to develop close relationships with their followers, and such relationships carry important marketing implications for social media influencers and brands. The present study examines the antecedents and outcomes of followers’ parasocial relationships with social media influencers. Drawing upon the theoretical lens of parasocial interaction theory, influence framework, and attribution framework, the study proposes and empirically tests the effects of social media influencers’ influence attempts on parasocial relationships, and the subsequent downstream outcomes of perceived endorser motives and consumer purchase intentions. Using a survey-based approach, the study collected 361 usable responses, and data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The study found that (1) influence attempts (i.e., attractiveness, prestige, and expertise) positively influence parasocial relationships, whereas (2) parasocial relationships negatively influence perceived endorser motive (self-serving), which in turn (3) reduces purchase intention, and (4) self-discrepancy moderates the relationships between influence attempts and parasocial relationships. Two post-hoc exploratory analyses uncovers the impacts of number of followers and gender in the proposed relationships. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.025

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 112 references

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Aw, E. C.-X., & Chuah, S. H.-W.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
132
Pages
146-157
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159051660
Cited by
312
References
112
FWCI
60.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.025
The paper
Aw, E. C.-X., & Chuah, S. H.-W. (2021). “Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.