The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy
Abstract
Abstract The unprecedented interactivity of social media has empowered social media influencers to develop close relationships with their followers, and such relationships carry important marketing implications for social media influencers and brands. The present study examines the antecedents and outcomes of followers’ parasocial relationships with social media influencers. Drawing upon the theoretical lens of parasocial interaction theory, influence framework, and attribution framework, the study proposes and empirically tests the effects of social media influencers’ influence attempts on parasocial relationships, and the subsequent downstream outcomes of perceived endorser motives and consumer purchase intentions. Using a survey-based approach, the study collected 361 usable responses, and data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The study found that (1) influence attempts (i.e., attractiveness, prestige, and expertise) positively influence parasocial relationships, whereas (2) parasocial relationships negatively influence perceived endorser motive (self-serving), which in turn (3) reduces purchase intention, and (4) self-discrepancy moderates the relationships between influence attempts and parasocial relationships. Two post-hoc exploratory analyses uncovers the impacts of number of followers and gender in the proposed relationships. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203 · Cited by 27,541
Research methods for business: A skill building approach
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90168-f · Cited by 16,985
Spence, M. (1973) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1882010 · Cited by 16,171
Qu, X. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s455 · Cited by 14,705
Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach
Kock, N. (2015) · International Journal of e-Collaboration · doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101 · Cited by 10,215
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · Cited by 4,380
Cited by
Lo, P.-S., Dwivedi, Y. K., Wei-Han Tan, G., Ooi, K.-B., Cheng-Xi Aw, E., & Metri, B. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.013 · Cited by 396
Impact of Social Media Influencers on Customer Engagement and Purchase Intention: A Meta-Analysis
Ao, L., Bansal, R., Pruthi, N., & Khaskheli, M. B. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15032744 · Cited by 279
Cheung, M. L., Leung, W. K. S., Aw, E. C.-X., & Koay, K. Y. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102940 · Cited by 269
Self-citationEffects of human versus virtual human influencers on the appearance anxiety of social media users
Deng, F., & Jiang, X. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103233 · Cited by 172
Influencer Marketing: Role of Influencer Credibility and Congruence on Brand Attitude and eWOM
Dhun, & Dangi, H. K. (2023) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2022.2125220 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Aw, E. C.-X., & Chuah, S. H.-W.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 146-157
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159051660
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 60.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.025
- The paper
- Aw, E. C.-X., & Chuah, S. H.-W. (2021). “Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.