Cited by 172Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorDigital Marketing and Social Media

Effects of human versus virtual human influencers on the appearance anxiety of social media users

Deng, Fengyi, Jiang, Xia·2023·Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103233

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, F., & Jiang, X.
Affiliations
Chongqing Technology and Business University (CN)
Corresponding author
Deng, Fengyi
Venue
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
71
Pages
103233
ISSN
0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313252809
Cited by
172
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 29
FWCI
29.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
appearance anxiety, appearance dissatisfaction, social media influencers, virtual influencers, human influencers, influencer marketing, women, scenic images, social media use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review