CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesUniversity-Industry-Government Innovation ModelsAgglomeration and Urban Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial features of entrepreneurial ecosystems

Fischer, Bruno, Meissner, Dirk, Vonortas, Nicholas, Guerrero, Maribel·2022·Journal of Business Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.018

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 127

  1. Acs, 2009, The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics, 32, 15, 10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3 · DOI
  2. Adler, 2019, The city and high-tech startups: The spatial organization of Schumpeterian entrepreneurship, Cities, 87, 121, 10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.013 · DOI
  3. Agrawal, 2003, The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1227, 10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00081-X · DOI
  4. Alvedalen, 2017, A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda, European Planning Studies, 25, 887, 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Alves, 2021, Ecosystems of entrepreneurship: Configurations and critical dimensions, Annals of Regional Science, 67, 73, 10.1007/s00168-020-01041-y · DOI
  6. Amin, 2004, Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place, Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 86, 33, 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00152.x · DOI
  7. Arauzo-Carod, J. -. (2021). Location determinants of high-tech firms: An intra-urban approach. Industry and Innovation, doi:10.1080/13662716.2021.1929868. · DOI
  8. Ascani, A., Bettarelli, L., Resmini, L., & Balland, P. -. (2020). Global networks, local specialisation and regional patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 49(8) doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104031. · DOI
  9. Asheim, 2011, Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy, Regional Studies, 45, 875, 10.1080/00343404.2011.596701 · DOI
  10. Audretsch, 1998, Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14, 18, 10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18 · DOI
  11. Auerswald, P. (2015). Enabling entrepreneurial ecosystems: insights from ecology to inform effective entrepreneurship policy. Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship. · DOI
  12. Auerswald, 2017, The adaptive life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The biotechnology cluster, Small Business Economics, 49, 97, 10.1007/s11187-017-9869-3 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Autio, 2018, Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 72, 10.1002/sej.1266 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bailey, 2004, Identifying ecoregion boundaries, Environmental Management, 34, S14, 10.1007/s00267-003-0163-6 · DOI
  15. Bailey, 1985, The factor of scale in ecosystem mapping, Environmental Management, 9, 271, 10.1007/BF01867299 · DOI
  16. Bailey, 1983, Delineation of ecosystem regions, Environmental Management, 7, 365, 10.1007/BF01866919 · DOI
  17. Balland, 2021, Complementary interregional linkages and smart specialisation: An empirical study on European regions, Regional Studies, 55, 1059, 10.1080/00343404.2020.1861240 · DOI
  18. Balland, P., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2020). Proximity, Innovation and Networks: A Concise Review and Some Next Steps. [Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography #20.19]. Utrecht University.
  19. Bathelt, 2005, Resources in economic geography: From substantive concepts towards a relational perspective, Environment and Planning A, 37, 1545, 10.1068/a37109 · DOI
  20. Bathelt, 2003, Toward a relational economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 117, 10.1093/jeg/3.2.117 · DOI
  21. Belitski, M., & Godley, A. (2020). The synergy approach to understand Entrepreneurship and Innovation Ecosystem Taxonomy. In: Tsvetkova, A., Schmutzler, J., & Pugh, R. (eds). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Meet Innovation Systems Synergies, Policy Lessons and Overlooked Dimensions. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Chapter 7. · DOI
  22. Berry, 2012, The city size distribution debate: Resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas, Cities, 29, S17, 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.007 · DOI
  23. Bloom, N., Hassan, T., Kalyani, A., Lerner, J., & Tahoun, A. (2021). The diffusion of disruptive technologies. [Working Paper 28999], National Bureau of Economic Research. · DOI
  24. Bond-Smith, 2020, A multi-sector model of relatedness, growth and industry clustering, Journal of Economic Geography, 20, 1145, 10.1093/jeg/lbz031 · DOI
  25. Boschma, 2005, Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment, Regional Studies, 39, 61, 10.1080/0034340052000320887 · DOI
  26. Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks: A proximity perspective. The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 120–138. doi: 10.4337/9781849806497. · DOI
  27. Bosker, M., Park, J., & Roberts, M. (2018). Definition Matters: Metropolitan Areas and Agglomeration Economies in a Large Developing Country. [Policy Research Working Paper 8641], World Bank Group. · DOI
  28. Breschi, 2001, Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered, Papers in Regional Science, 80, 255, 10.1111/j.1435-5597.2001.tb01799.x · DOI
  29. Brown, 2017, Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Small Business Economics, 49, 11, 10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Bruns, 2017, Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A regional cross-section growth regression approach, Small Business Economics, 49, 31, 10.1007/s11187-017-9866-6 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Cadenasso, 2003, A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries, Bioscience, 53, 750, 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0750:AFFATO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  32. Cao, 2021, A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies, Small Business Economics, 57, 75, 10.1007/s11187-020-00326-y · DOI
  33. Carayannis, 2009, ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management, 46, 201, 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 · DOI
  34. Carayannis, 2018, The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple helix innovation models, R&D Management, 48, 148, 10.1111/radm.12300 · DOI
  35. Carayannis, 2016, Entrepreneurship ecosystems: An agent-based simulation approach, Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 631, 10.1007/s10961-016-9466-7 · DOI
  36. Chauvin, 2017, What is different about urbanization in rich and poor countries? Cities in Brazil, China, India and the United States, Journal of Urban Economics, 98, 17, 10.1016/j.jue.2016.05.003 · DOI
  37. Clarysse, 2014, Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems, Research Policy, 43, 1164, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014 · DOI
  38. Crescenzi, 2017, The geography of innovation in China and India, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41, 1010, 10.1111/1468-2427.12554 · DOI
  39. Cristelli, G., & Lissoni, F. (2020). Free Movement of Inventors: Open-Border Policy and Innovation in Switzerland. [MPRA Paper n. 104120]. · DOI
  40. da Cruz, 2020, The metropolitan scale, Cities, 100, 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102644 · DOI
  41. De Noni, 2017, The impact of intra- and inter-regional knowledge collaboration and technological variety on the knowledge productivity of European regions, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 108, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.003 · DOI
  42. De Noni, 2018, The role of collaborative networks in supporting the innovation performances of lagging-behind European regions, Research Policy, 47, 1, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.006 · DOI
  43. Delgado, 2010, Clusters and entrepreneurship, Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 495, 10.1093/jeg/lbq010 · DOI
  44. Dias Sant́Ana, T., de Souza Bermejo, P. H., Moreira, M. F., & de Souza, W. V. B. (2020). The structure of an innovation ecosystem: Foundations for future research. Management Decision, doi: 10.1108/MD-03-2019-0383. · DOI
  45. Dicken, 2001, Firms in territories: A relational perspective, Economic Geography, 77, 345
  46. Dingel, 2021, Cities, lights, and skills in developing economies, Journal of Urban Economics, 125, 10.1016/j.jue.2019.05.005 · DOI
  47. Doloreux, 2002, What we should know about regional systems of innovation, Technology in Society, 24, 243, 10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6 · DOI
  48. Ellison, 1997, Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach, Journal of Political Economy, 105, 889, 10.1086/262098 · DOI
  49. Espinoza-Benavides, 2021, Dissecting the ecosystems’ determinants of entrepreneurial re-entry after a business failure, European Business Review, 33, 975, 10.1108/EBR-09-2020-0222 · DOI
  50. Faggio, 2020, Tales of the city: What do agglomeration cases tell us about agglomeration in general?, Journal of Economic Geography, 20, 1117, 10.1093/jeg/lbaa007 · DOI
  51. Fischer, 2018, On the location of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship in developing countries: Lessons from São Paulo, Brazil. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30, 612, 10.1080/08985626.2018.1438523 · DOI
  52. Ghazinoory, 2021, Innovation lives in ecotones, not ecosystems, Journal of Business Research, 135, 572, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.067 · DOI
  53. Gilbert, 2004, The emergence of entrepreneurship policy, Small Business Economics, 22, 313, 10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000022235.10739.a8 · DOI
  54. Giuliani, 2013, Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile, Research Policy, 42, 1406, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.002 · DOI
  55. Glaeser, 2017, Urban economics for the developing world: An introduction, Journal of Urban Economics, 98, 1, 10.1016/j.jue.2017.01.003 · DOI
  56. Glückler, 2007, Economic geography and the evolution of networks, Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 619, 10.1093/jeg/lbm023 · DOI
  57. Godley, 2021, The complementarity perspective to the entrepreneurial ecosystem taxonomy, Small Business Economics, 56, 723, 10.1007/s11187-019-00197-y · DOI
  58. Gordon, 2000, Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks?, Urban Studies, 37, 513, 10.1080/0042098002096 · DOI
  59. Guerrero, 2017, The impact of triple helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations’ performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 294, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.015 · DOI
  60. Guerrero, 2019, Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: An overview, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1347, 10.1007/s10961-019-09736-x · DOI
  61. He, 2009, Is inventor network structure a predictor of cluster evolution?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 91, 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.020 · DOI
  62. Hervás-Oliver, 2021, The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU, Research Policy, 50, 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316 · DOI
  63. Huggins, 2019, Regional advantage and the geography of networks: Explaining global–local knowledge sourcing patterns, Papers in Regional Science, 98, 1567, 10.1111/pirs.12423 · DOI
  64. Huggins, 2015, Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: A network theory, Small Business Economics, 45, 103, 10.1007/s11187-015-9643-3 · DOI
  65. Huggins, 2013, A network-based view of regional growth, Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 511, 10.1093/jeg/lbt012 · DOI
  66. Innocenti, 2020, Knowledge networks and industrial structure for regional innovation: An analysis of patents collaborations in Italy, Papers in Regional Science, 99, 55, 10.1111/pirs.12478 · DOI
  67. Jaffe, 1993, Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577, 10.2307/2118401 · DOI
  68. Jolley, 2019, Entrepreneurial ecosystems and public policy, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 8, 293, 10.1108/JEPP-09-2019-115 · DOI
  69. Kerr, 2015, Agglomerative forces and cluster shapes, Review of Economics and Statistics, 97, 877, 10.1162/REST_a_00471 · DOI
  70. Ketonen-Oksi, 2019, Innovation ecosystems as structures for value co-creation, Technology Innovation Management Review, 9, 25, 10.22215/timreview/1216 · DOI
  71. Kolasa, 2014, Ecological boundaries: A derivative of ecological entities, Web Ecology, 14, 27, 10.5194/we-14-27-2014 · DOI
  72. Krugman, 1991, Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483, 10.1086/261763 · DOI
  73. Kuckertz, 2019, Let’s take the entrepreneurial ecosystem metaphor seriously!, Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 11, 10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00124 · DOI
  74. Lang, 2020, The origin, evolution, and application of the megapolitan area concept, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 24, 1, 10.1080/12265934.2019.1696220 · DOI
  75. Lee, 2013, Regional knowledge production and entrepreneurial firm creation: Spatial dynamic analyses, Journal of Business Research, 66, 2106, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.037 · DOI
  76. Lee, J. -., Lee, K., Meissner, D., Radosevic, S., & Vonortas, N. S. (2021). Local capacity, innovative entrepreneurial places and global connections: An overview. Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(3), 563-573. doi: 10.1007/s10961-020-09812-7. · DOI
  77. Lee, 2018, From global value chains (GVC) to innovation systems for local value chains and knowledge creation, European Journal of Development Research, 30, 424, 10.1057/s41287-017-0111-6 · DOI
  78. Levin, 1992, The problem of pattern and scale in ecology, Ecology, 73, 1943, 10.2307/1941447 · DOI
  79. Mack, 2016, The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Urban Studies, 53, 2118, 10.1177/0042098015586547 · DOI
  80. Malecki, 2018, Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography, Compass, 12, 1
  81. Malerba, 2020, Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems, Small Business Economics, 54, 503, 10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2 · DOI
  82. Markusen, 1996, Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts, Economic Geography, 72, 293, 10.2307/144402 · DOI
  83. Maskell, 2001, The firm in economic geography, Economic Geography, 77, 329
  84. Meuer, 2015, Layers of co-existing innovation systems, Research Policy, 44, 888, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.013 · DOI
  85. Milgram, S. (1967). The small-world problem. Psychology Today, 1(1), 61–67. · DOI
  86. Moreno, 2005, Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions, Environment and Planning A, 37, 1793, 10.1068/a37341 · DOI
  87. Moreno-Monroy, A. I., Schiavina, M., & Veneri, P. (2020). Metropolitan areas in the world. delineation and population trends. Journal of Urban Economics, doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2020.103242. · DOI
  88. Muñoz, 2020, Local entrepreneurial ecosystems as configural narratives: A new way of seeing and evaluating antecedents and outcomes, Research Policy
  89. Nambisan, 2018, On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 354, 10.1002/sej.1300 · DOI
  90. Nelles, 2021, Alternative manifestations of metropolisation: Spatial dissimilarity and the tensions between heuristics and realities of metropolisation, Urban Geography, 42, 21, 10.1080/02723638.2019.1670572 · DOI
  91. Neuländtner, 2020, Geographical or relational: What drives technology-specific R&D collaboration networks?, Annals of Regional Science, 65, 743, 10.1007/s00168-020-01002-5 · DOI
  92. Nicotra, 2018, The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: A measurement framework, Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 640, 10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2 · DOI
  93. Oh, D. -., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004. · DOI
  94. Ottensmann, 1996, The new central cities: Implications of the new definition of the metropolitan area, Urban Affairs Review, 31, 681, 10.1177/107808749603100505 · DOI
  95. Phillips, 2018, Exploring emerging ecosystem boundaries: Defining ‘the game’, International Journal of Innovation Management, 22, 10.1142/S1363919618400121 · DOI
  96. Pombo-Juárez, 2017, Wiring up multiple layers of innovation ecosystems: Contemplations from personal health systems foresight, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 278, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.018 · DOI
  97. Post, 2007, The problem of boundaries in defining ecosystems: A potential landmine for uniting geomorphology and ecology, Geomorphology, 89, 111, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.014 · DOI
  98. Qian, 2013, Regional systems of entrepreneurship: The nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation, Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 559, 10.1093/jeg/lbs009 · DOI
  99. Radziwon, 2019, Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 573, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021 · DOI
  100. Radosevic, 2013, Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems: Theory, methodology and evidence, Research Policy, 42, 1015, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.011 · DOI
  101. Ratten, 2020, Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Future research trends, Thunderbird International Business Review, 62, 623, 10.1002/tie.22163 · DOI
  102. Rodrigues da Silva, 2014, Defining functional urban regions in Bahia, Brazil, using roadway coverage and population density variables, Journal of Transport Geography, 36, 79, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.03.001 · DOI
  103. Rodríguez-Pose, 2021, Institutions and the Productivity Challenge for European Regions, Journal of Economic Geography
  104. Rondé, 2005, Innovation in regions: What does really matter?, Research Policy, 34, 1150, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.011 · DOI
  105. Rosenthal, 2008, The attenuation of human capital spillovers, Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 373, 10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.006 · DOI
  106. Roundy, 2016, Start-up community narratives: The discursive construction of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25, 232, 10.1177/0971355716650373 · DOI
  107. Roundy, 2018, The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach, Journal of Business Research, 86, 1, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032 · DOI · Paper page
  108. Schaeffer, 2018, Beyond education: The role of research universities in innovation ecosystems, Foresight and STI Governance, 12, 50, 10.17323/2500-2597.2018.2.50.61 · DOI
  109. Schäfer, 2021, Spatialities of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography, Compass, 15
  110. Schäfer, 2018, The evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems and the critical role of migrants. A phase-model based on a study of IT startups in the greater Tel Aviv area, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11, 317, 10.1093/cjres/rsy013 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Shaw, 2018, Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 88, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.030 · DOI
  112. Spigel, 2017, The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41, 49
  113. Stam, 2015, Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique, European Planning Studies, 23, 1759, 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 · DOI · Paper page
  114. Stam, 2019, Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements, Small Business Economics
  115. Stangler, D., & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship. · DOI
  116. Sternberg, 2019, A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level, Zeitschrift Fur Wirtschaftsgeographie, 10.1515/zfw-2018-0014 · DOI
  117. Strayer, 2003, A classification of ecological boundaries, Bioscience, 53, 723, 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0723:ACOEB]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  118. Strumsky, 2013, Profiling US metropolitan regions by their social research networks and regional economic performance, Journal of Regional Science, 53, 813, 10.1111/jors.12048 · DOI
  119. Suominen, 2019, A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: A research agenda, European Journal of Innovation Management, 22, 335, 10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188 · DOI
  120. Taylor, 1975, Organizational growth, spatial interaction and location decision-making, Regional Studies, 9, 313, 10.1080/09595237500185361 · DOI
  121. Ter Wal, 2011, Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space, Regional Studies, 45, 919, 10.1080/00343400802662658 · DOI
  122. Tóth, 2021, Repeated collaboration of inventors across European regions, European Planning Studies, 10.1080/09654313.2021.1914555 · DOI
  123. Tsouri, 2021, Structure and resilience of local knowledge networks: The case of the ICT network in Trentino, Industry and Innovation, 28, 860, 10.1080/13662716.2020.1775070 · DOI
  124. Vedula, 2019, Regional recipes: A configurational analysis of the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem for US venture capital-backed startups, Strategy Science, 4, 4, 10.1287/stsc.2019.0076 · DOI
  125. Walsh, 2019, Prior employment as a causal mechanism within entrepreneurial ecosystems, Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6, 637, 10.1080/21681376.2019.1691047 · DOI
  126. Yao, 2020, Urban innovation and intercity patent collaboration: A network analysis of China’s national innovation system, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120185 · DOI
  127. Zhang, 2020, Configurational paths to regional innovation performance: The interplay of innovation elements based on a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10.1080/09537325.2020.1773423 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fischer, B., Meissner, D., Vonortas, N., & Guerrero, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
  • Universidad del Desarrollo (CL)
Corresponding author
  • Fischer, Bruno
  • Meissner, Dirk
  • Vonortas, Nicholas
  • Guerrero, Maribel
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
147
Pages
27-36
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.018
OpenAlex
W4226354915
Cited by
106
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agglomeration and Urban Systems
Keywords
entrepreneurial ecosystems, spatial scale, ecosystem boundaries, biomimetics, entrepreneurship, innovation, knowledge diffusion, administrative boundaries, economic geography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review