Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism and microkinetics of methanol synthesis via CO2 hydrogenation on indium oxide

Open access
Frei, M.S., Capdevila-Cortada, M., García-Muelas, R., Mondelli, C., López, N., Stewart, J.A., Curulla Ferré, D., Pérez-Ramírez, J.·2018·Journal of Catalysis

Abstract

Abstract Indium oxide has emerged as a highly effective catalyst for methanol synthesis by direct CO 2 hydrogenation. Aiming at gathering a deeper fundamental understanding, mechanistic and (micro)kinetic aspects of this catalytic system were investigated. Steady-state evaluation at 5 MPa and variable temperature indicated a lower apparent activation energy for CO 2 hydrogenation than for the reverse watergas shift reaction (103 versus 117 kJ mol −1 ), which is in line with the high methanol selectivity observed. Upon changing the partial pressure of reactants and products, apparent reaction orders of −0.1, 0.5, −0.2, and −0.9 were determined for CO 2 , H 2 , methanol, and water, respectively, which highlight a strong inhibition by the latter. Co-feeding of H 2 O led to catalyst deactivation by sintering for partial pressures exceeding 0.125 MPa, while addition of the byproduct CO to the gas stream could be favorable at a total pressure below 4 MPa but was detrimental at higher pressures. Density Functional Theory simulations conducted on In 2 O 3 (1 1 1), which was experimentally and theoretically shown to be the most exposed surface termination, indicated that oxygen vacancies surrounded by three indium atoms enable the activation of CO 2 and split hydrogen heterolytically, stabilizing the polarized species formed. The most energetically favored path to methanol comprises three consecutive additions of hydrides and protons and features CH 2 OOH and CH 2 (OH) 2 as intermediates. Microkinetic modeling based on the DFT results provided values for temperature and concentration-dependent parameters, which are in good agreement with the empirically obtained data. These results are expected to drive further optimization of In 2 O 3 -based materials and serve as a solid basis for reactor and process design, thus fostering advances towards a potential large-scale methanol synthesis from CO 2 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.03.014

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Frei, M. S., Capdevila-Cortada, M., García-Muelas, R., Mondelli, C., López, N., Stewart, J. A., Curulla Ferré, D., & Pérez-Ramírez, J.
Venue
Journal of Catalysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
361
Pages
313-321
ISSN
0021-9517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795037618
Cited by
344
References
31
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism and microkinetics of methanol synthesis via CO2 hydrogenation on indium oxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.03.014
The paper
Frei, M. S., Capdevila-Cortada, M., García-Muelas, R., Mondelli, C., López, N., Stewart, J. A., Curulla Ferré, D., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2018). Mechanism and microkinetics of methanol synthesis via CO2 hydrogenation on indium oxide. Journal of Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.03.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.