Cited by 38Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMental Health Research Topics

The relationship between value-based actions, psychological distress and well-being: A multilevel diary study

Grégoire, Simon, Doucerain, Marina, Morin, Laurence, Finkelstein-Fox, Lucy·2021·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.03.006

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Barrett, K., O'Connor, M., & McHugh, L. (2019). A systematic review of values-based psychometric tools within acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). Psychological Record , 69 (4), 457-485. https: // doi.org / 10.1007 / s40732019-00352-7
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-e ects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software , 67 (1), 1-48. https: // doi.org / 10.18637 / jss.v067.i01
  3. Bostic, T. J., McGartland Rubio, D., & Hood, M. (2000). A validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling. Social Indicators Research , 52 (3), 313-324. https: // doi.org / 10.1023 / A:1007136110218
  4. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 1 (3), 185-216. https: // doi.org / 10.1177 / 135910457000100301
  5. Carballeira, Y., Dumont, P., Borgacci, S., Rentsch, D., Tonnac, N., Archinard, M., & Andreoli, A. (2007). Criterion validity of the French version of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in a hospital department of internal medicine. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice , 80 (1), 69-77. https: // doi.org / 10.1348 / 147608306X103641
  6. Degroote, L., Desmet, A., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Van Dyck, D., & Crombez, G. (2020). March 10). Content validity and methodological considerations in ecological momentary assessment studies on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity , 17, 35. https: // doi.org / 10.1186 / s12966-020-00932-9
  7. Dohrenwend, B. P., Shrout, P. E., Ergi, G. E., & Mendelsohn, F. S. (1980). Nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology: Measures for use in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry , 37 (11), 1229-1236. https: // doi.org / 10.1001 / archpsyc.1980.01780240027003
  8. Finkelstein-Fox, L., Pavlacic, J. M., Buchanan, E. M., Schulenberg, S. E., & Park, C. L. (2019). Valued living in daily experience: Relations with mindfulness, meaning, psychological flexibility, and stressors. Cognitive Therapy and Research , 1-11. https: // doi.org / 10.1007 / s10608-019-100627
  9. Goldberg, S. B., Hanley, A. W., Baldwin, S. A., Bernstein, A., & Garland, E. L. (2020). Does mindfulness practice promote psychological functioning or is it the other way around? A daily diary study. Psychotherapy . https: // doi.org / 10.1037 / pst0000286
  10. Granott, N., Parziale, J. (2002). Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning . Cambridge university press.
  11. Grégoire, S., Chénier, C., Doucerain, M., Lachance, L., & Shankland, R. (2020). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science , 52 (3), 231-243. https: // doi.org / 10.1037 / cbs0000175.
  12. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy, second edition: The process and practice of mindful change [hardcover] . Retrieved from http: // www.amazon.com / AcceptanceCommitment-Therapy-Second-Practice / dp / 1 609189620.
  13. Jaworska, N., De Somma, E., Fonseka, B., Heck, E., & MacQueen, G. M. (2016). Mental health services for students at postsecondary institutions: A national survey. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(12), 766-775. https: // doi.org / 10.1177 / 0706743716640752
  14. Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002). The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Annals, 32(9), 509-515
  15. Lemyre, L., & Lalande-Markon, M.-P. (2009). Psychological stress measure (PSM-9): Integration of an evidence-based approach to assessment, monitoring, and evaluation of stress in physical therapy practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice , 25 (56), 453-462. https: // doi.org / 10.1080 / 09593980902886321
  16. Levav, J., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2006). When questions change behavior: The role of ease of representation. Psychological Science, 17(3), 207-213.
  17. Lundgren, T., Luoma, J. B., Dahl, L., Strosahl, K. D., & Melin, L. (2012). The bull's-eye values survey: A psychometric evaluation. Cognitive and Behavioral Science , 19 (4), 518-526.
  18. Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language , 94 , 305-315. https: // doi.org / 10.1016 / j.jml.2017.01.001
  19. Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-e ects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4 (2), 133-142. https: // doi.org / 10.1111 / j.2041210x.2012.00261.x
  20. Pollack, S., & Herres, J. (2020). Prior day negative affect influences current day procrastination: A lagged daily diary analysis. Anxiety, Stress Coping , 33 (2), 165-175. https: // doi.org / 10.1080 / 10615806.2020.1722573
  21. Schneider, S., & Stone, A. A. (2016). Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patientreported outcomes. Quality of Life Research , 25 (3), 497-506
  22. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine , 166 (10), 1092-1097.
  23. Stone, A. A., & Shi man, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine , 24 (3), 236-243. https: // doi.org / 10.1207 / S15324796ABM2403\_09
  24. Stone, A. A., Shi man, S., Atienza, A. A., & Nebeling, L. (2007). The science of real-time date capture: Self-reports in health research . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  25. Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The warwickedinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 5 (1), 63. https: // doi.org / 10.1186 / 1477-7525-5-63
  26. Trousselard, M., Steiler, D., Dutheil, F., Claverie, D., Canini, F., Fenouillet, F., & Franck, N. (2016). Validation of the warwick-edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) in French psychiatric and general populations. Psychiatry Research , 245 , 282-290. https: // doi.org / 10.1016 / j.psychres.2016.08.050

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grégoire, S., Doucerain, M., Morin, L., & Finkelstein-Fox, L.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Grégoire, Simon
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
20
Pages
79-88
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3140456704
Cited by
38
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • Archipel (Université du Québec à Montréal) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
value-based action, psychological distress, well-being, daily fluctuations, intraday variability, day-to-day variability, postsecondary students, time-lagged effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review