Cited by 6Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

The role of psychological flexibility in palliative care

Martin, Christopher L., Pakenham, Kenneth I.·2022·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.05.004

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, C. L., & Pakenham, K. I.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Martin, Christopher L.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
24
Pages
160-170
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4228999823
Cited by
6
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
psychological flexibility, palliative care, acceptance and commitment therapy, quality of life, psychosocial distress, attitudes toward death, pain, existential dread, informal caregivers, values-based action, mindfulness, acceptance, self-help intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review