Cited by 78Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Flexibly and/or inflexibly embracing life: Identifying fundamental approaches to life with latent profile analyses on the dimensions of the Hexaflex model

Stabbe, Oliver K., Rolffs, Jaci L., Rogge, Ronald D.·2019·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.03.003

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stabbe, O. K., Rolffs, J. L., & Rogge, R. D.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Rogge, Ronald D.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
12
Pages
106-118
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921295094
Cited by
78
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
psychological flexibility, psychological inflexibility, latent profile analysis, person-centered approach, psychological distress, rumination, impulse control difficulties, physical health problems, well-being, change over time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review