Cited by 492Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsRadiation Dose and ImagingLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology

Hecht, Harvey S., Cronin, Paul, Blaha, Michael J., Budoff, Matthew J., Kazerooni, Ella A., Narula, Jagat, Yankelevitz, David, Abbara, Suhny·2017·Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Abstract

The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) and the Society of Thoracic Radiology (STR) have jointly produced this document. Experts in this subject have been selected from both organizations to examine subject-specific data and write this guideline in partnership. A formal literature review, weighing the strength of evidence has been performed. When available, information from studies on cost was considered. Computed tomography (CT) acquisition, CAC scoring methodologies and clinical outcomes are the primary basis for the recommendations in this guideline. This guideline is intended to assist healthcare providers in clinical decision making. The recommendations reflect a consensus after a thorough review of the best available current scientific evidence and practice patterns of experts in the field and are intended to improve patient care while acknowledging that situations arise where additional information may be needed to better inform patient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.11.003

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All coronary lesions were interpreted following the 2016 SCCT guidelines for their location, stenosis grade, composition (calcified, mixed, and non-calcified) as well as their vulnerability (positive remodeling, low-attenuation plaque, spotty calcification, and the napkin-ring sign).

    “All coronary lesions were interpreted following the 2016 SCCT guidelines for their location, stenosis grade, composition (calcified, mixed, and non-calcified) as well as their vulnerability (positive remodeling, low-attenuation plaque, spotty calcification, and the napkin-ring sign).12,13”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hecht, H. S., Cronin, P., Blaha, M. J., Budoff, M. J., Kazerooni, E. A., Narula, J., Yankelevitz, D., & Abbara, S.
Affiliations
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
  • Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Abbara, Suhny
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
74-84
ISSN
  • 1876-861X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5925
OpenAlex
W2550578523
Cited by
492
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 16
FWCI
21.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-03-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
coronary artery calcium scoring, CT acquisition parameters, clinical outcomes, cardiovascular risk stratification, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coronary Artery Disease, Humans, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment, Consensus, Incidental Findings, Vascular Calcification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review