Cited by 26Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Use of coronary artery calcium testing to improve coronary heart disease risk assessment in a lung cancer screening population: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Open access
Garg, Parveen K., Jorgensen, Neal W., McClelland, Robyn L., Leigh, J. Adam, Greenland, Philip, Blaha, Michael J., Yoon, Andrew J., Wong, Nathan D. +2 more·2018·Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Abstract

Background Assessment of coronary artery calcium (CAC) during lung cancer screening chest computed tomography (CT) represents an opportunity to identify asymptomatic individuals at increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. We determined the improvement in CHD risk prediction associated with the addition of CAC testing in a population recommended for lung cancer screening.Methods We included 484 out of 6814 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) participants without baseline cardiovascular disease who met U.S. Preventive Service Task Force CT lung cancer screening criteria and underwent gated CAC testing. 10 year-predicted CHD risks with and without CAC were calculated using a validated MESA-based risk model and categorized into low (<5%), intermediate (5%-10%), and high (≥10%). The net reclassification improvement (NRI) and change in Harrell's C-statistic by adding CAC to the risk model were subsequently determined.Results Of 484 included participants (mean age = 65; 39% women; 32% black), 72 (15%) experienced CHD events over the course of follow-up (median = 12.5 years). Adding CAC to the MESA CHD risk model resulted in 17% more participants classified into the highest or lowest risk categories and a NRI of 0.26 (p = 0.001). The C-statistic improved from 0.538 to 0.611 (p = 0.01).Conclusions CHD event rates were high in this lung cancer screening eligible population. These individuals represent a high-risk population who merit consideration for CHD prevention measures regardless of CAC score. Although overall discrimination remained poor with inclusion of CAC scores, determining whether those reclassified to an even higher risk would benefit from more aggressive preventive measures may be important.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.10.001

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, 41-57% of statin-eligible individuals had a coronary artery calcium score of zero, and the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event rate was low at 1.5-4.9%.

    “Data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) showed that 41-57% of individuals who would be eligible for statin therapy had a CAC score of zero and the rate of atherosclerotic CVD events in the 10 year follow-up period was low (1.5-4.9%) [26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garg, P. K., Jorgensen, N. W., McClelland, R. L., Leigh, J. A., Greenland, P., Blaha, M. J., Yoon, A. J., Wong, N. D., Yeboah, J., & Budoff, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • The Lundquist Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Garg, Parveen K.
  • Jorgensen, Neal W.
  • McClelland, Robyn L.
  • Leigh, J. Adam
  • Greenland, Philip
  • Blaha, Michael J.
  • Yoon, Andrew J.
  • Wong, Nathan D.
  • Yeboah, Joseph
  • Budoff, Matthew J.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
493-499
ISSN
  • 1876-861X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5925
OpenAlex
W2895547458
Cited by
26
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201500003I, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, N01-HC-95169)
  • NCATS (UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, UL1-TR-001420)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
coronary artery calcium, coronary heart disease risk prediction, lung cancer screening, CT lung cancer screening, risk reclassification, cardiovascular risk prediction models, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, net reclassification improvement, concordance index, cardiovascular disease prevention
MeSH terms
Computed Tomography Angiography, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vessels, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Coronary Angiography, Early Detection of Cancer, Vascular Calcification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review