Cited by 80Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

Sweat test for cystic fibrosis: Wearable sweat sensor vs. standard laboratory test

Open access
Choi, Dong-Hoon, Thaxton, Abigail, Jeong, In cheol, Kim, Kain, Sosnay, Patrick R., Cutting, Garry R., Searson, Peter C.·2018·Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Abstract

Background Sweat chloride testing for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) involves sweat induction, collection and handling, and measurement in an analytical lab. We have developed a wearable sensor with an integrated salt bridge for real-time measurement of sweat chloride concentration. Here, in a proof-of-concept study, we compare the performance of the sensor to current clinical practice in CF patients and healthy subjects.Method Sweat was induced on both forearms of 10 individuals with CF and 10 healthy subjects using pilocarpine iontophoresis. A Macroduct sweat collection device was attached to one arm and sweat was collected for 30 min and then sent for laboratory analysis. A sensor was attached to the other arm and the chloride ion concentration monitored in real time for 30 min using a Bluetooth transceiver and smart phone app.Results Stable sweat chloride measurements were obtained within 15 min following sweat induction using the wearable sensor. We define the detection time as the time at which the standard deviation of the real-time chloride ion concentration remained below 2 mEq/L for 5 min. The sweat volume for sensor measurements at the detection time was 13.1 ± 11.4 μL (SD), in many cases lower than the minimum sweat volume of 15 μL for conventional testing. The mean difference between sweat chloride concentrations measured by the sensor and the conventional laboratory practice was 6.2 ± 9.5 mEq/L (SD), close to the arm-to-arm variation of about 3 mEq/L. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two measurements was 0.97 highlighting the excellent agreement between the two methods.Conclusion A wearable sensor can be used to make real-time measurements of sweat chloride within 15 min following sweat induction, requiring a small sweat volume, and with excellent agreement to standard methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.03.005

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wearables are applied in diverse fields of health.

    “Apart from these 2 examples, wearables are applied in diverse fields of health, including acoustic, gastrointestinal sensors for ileus prediction [18]; UV sun exposure [19]; heat-related illness measurements [20]; electrolyte monitoring, for example, for cystic fibrosis or training management [21,22]; early warning of AF with a wearable ring [23]; generation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) [15];”
  • Numerous reviews and studies have investigated validation and accuracy of specific affordable wearables compared to gold standard measurements or in meta-analysis.

    “Numerous reviews and studies have investigated validation and accuracy, particularly for specific affordable wearables, comparing these to the gold standard measurements [21] or comparing evidence in a meta-analysis [8].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tsuda T, Noda S, Kitagawa S, Morishita T. Proposal of sampling process for collecting human sweat and determination of caffeine concentration in it by using GC/MS. Biomed Chromatogr 2000;14:505-10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, D.-H., Thaxton, A., Jeong, I. C., Kim, K., Sosnay, P. R., Cutting, G. R., & Searson, P. C.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Searson, Peter C.
Venue
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
e35-e38
ISSN
1569-1993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789961258
Cited by
80
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (SEARSO6XX0)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Keywords
sweat test, wearable sensors, real-time monitoring, pilocarpine iontophoresis, sweat collection, salt bridges, point-of-care testing, sweat volume
MeSH terms
Point-of-Care Testing, Proof of Concept Study, Adult, Chlorides, Cystic Fibrosis, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Sweat, Reproducibility of Results, Dimensional Measurement Accuracy, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review