Cited by 68Laser-Ablation Synthesis of NanoparticlesElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

Laser synthesis, structure and chemical properties of colloidal nickel-molybdenum nanoparticles for the substitution of noble metals in heterogeneous catalysis

Marzun, Galina, Levish, Alexander, Mackert, Viktor, Kallio, Tanja, Barcikowski, Stephan, Wagener, Philipp·2017·Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Abstract

Platinum and iridium are rare and expensive noble metals that are used as catalysts for different sectors including in heterogeneous chemical automotive emission catalysis and electrochemical energy conversion. Nickel and its alloys are promising materials to substitute noble metals. Nickel based materials are cost-effective with good availability and show comparable catalytic performances. The nickel-molybdenum system is a very interesting alternative to platinum in water electrolysis. We produced ligand-free nickel-molybdenum nanoparticles by laser ablation in water and acetone. Our results show that segregated particles were formed in water due to the oxidation of the metals. X-ray diffraction shows a significant change in the lattice parameter due to a diffusion of molybdenum atoms into the nickel lattice with increasing activity in the electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction. Even though the solubility of molecular oxygen in acetone is higher than in water, there were no oxides and a more homogeneous metal distribution in the particles in acetone as seen by TEM-EDX. This showed that dissolved molecular oxygen does not control oxide formation. Overall, the laser ablation of pressed micro particulate mixtures in liquids offers a combinational synthesis approach that allows the screening of alloy nanoparticles for catalytic testing and can convert micro-mixtures into nano-alloys.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.09.014

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marzun, G., Levish, A., Mackert, V., Kallio, T., Barcikowski, S., & Wagener, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
Barcikowski, Stephan
Venue
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
489
Pages
57-67
ISSN
0021-9797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2519631727
Cited by
68
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  • Max Buchner Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
Keywords
laser ablation in liquid, platinum-free electrocatalysts, oxygen evolution reaction, ligand-free nanoparticles, lattice parameters, oxide formation, heterogeneous catalysis, water electrolysis, alloy nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review