Cited by 71Environmental Impact and SustainabilityExtraction and Separation ProcessesSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis

Environmental impacts of key metals’ supply and low-carbon technologies are likely to decrease in the future

Open access
Harpprecht, Carina, van Oers, Lauran, Northey, Stephen A., Yang, Yongxiang, Steubing, Bernhard·2021·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

The environmental benefits of low-carbon technologies, such as photovoltaic modules, have been under debate because their large-scale deployment will require a drastic increase in metal production. This is of concern because higher metal demand may induce ore grade decline and can thereby further intensify the environmental footprint of metal supply. To account for this interlinkage known as the “energy-resource nexus”, energy and metal supply scenarios need to be assessed in conjunction. We investigate the trends of future impacts of metal supplies and low-carbon technologies, considering both metal and electricity supply scenarios. We develop metal supply scenarios for copper, nickel, zinc, and lead, extending previous work. Our scenarios consider developments such as ore grade decline, energy-efficiency improvements, and secondary production shares. We also include two future electricity supply scenarios from the IMAGE model using a recently published methodology. Both scenarios are incorporated into the background database of ecoinvent to realize an integrated modeling approach, that is, future metal supply chains make use of future electricity and vice versa. We find that impacts of the modeled metal supplies and low-carbon technologies may decrease in the future. Key drivers for impact reductions are the electricity transition and increasing secondary production shares. Considering both metal and electricity scenarios has proven valuable because they drive impact reductions in different categories, namely human toxicity (up to −43%) and climate change (up to −63%), respectively. Thus, compensating for lower ore grades and reducing impacts beyond climate change requires both greener electricity and also sustainable metal supply. This article met the requirements for a Gold-Gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.13181

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electricity consumption is influenced by resource characteristics (e.g., ore grade and mineralogy) and technology.

    “It is noteworthy that electricity consumption is influenced by resource characteristics (e.g., ore grade and mineralogy) 29,30 and technology.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bruckner, T., Bashmakov, I. A., Mulugetta, Y., Chum, H., de la Vega Navarro, A., Edmonds, J., Faaij, A., Fungtammasan, B., Garg, A., Hertwich, E., Honnery, D., Infield, D., Kainuma, M., Khennas, S., Kim, S., Nimir, H. B., Riahi, K., Strachan, N., Wiser, R., & Zhang, X. (2014). Energy systems. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pages 5-1. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J., & Van Zelm, R. (2013). ReCiPe 2008, A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level First edition (version 1.08) Report I: Characterisation. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (VROM), The Netherlands.
  3. Norgate, T., & Rankin, W. J. (2000). Life cycle assessment of copper and nickel production. In International Conference on Minerals Processing and Extractive Metallurgy (pp. 133-138). Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
  4. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2007). Global Environment Outlook GEO-4: Environment for development. United Nations Environment Pro- gramme, Nairobi, Kenya. UNEP. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000108643.94730. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harpprecht, C., van Oers, L., Northey, S. A., Yang, Y., & Steubing, B.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML) Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Harpprecht, Carina
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2021-09-05
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1543-1559
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W3198878814
Cited by
71
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Keywords
low-carbon technologies, photovoltaic modules, copper, nickel, zinc, lead, ore grade decline, secondary production, environmental impact, climate change impacts, human toxicity, image models, energy efficiency improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review