The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The few studies that considered low rates of soil C sequestration in GHG accounting for beef production indicated potential emissions decreases of 24-535%”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“However, our 4-year AMP animal performance and days to finish were considerably different than that of previous studies”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151861 · Cited by 4,888
Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006) · Agritrop (Cirad) · Cited by 4,383
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902
IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology
Jolliet, O., Margni, M. D., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., & Rosenbaum, R. K. (2003) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02978505 · Cited by 1,968
Murty, D., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Mcmurtrie, R. E., & Mcgilvray, H. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00459.x · Cited by 996
Climate benefits of changing diet
Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., van Vuuren, D. P., den Elzen, M. G. J., Eickhout, B., & Kabat, P. (2009) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6 · Cited by 815
Amon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Amon, T., & Zechmeister‐Boltenstern, S. (2005) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030 · Cited by 683
Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farming
Cederberg, C., & Mattsson, B. (2000) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/s0959-6526(99)00311-x · Cited by 585
Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers
Garnett, T. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006 · Cited by 569
Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp)
Canals, L. M. I., Bauer, C., Depestele, J., Dubreuil, A., Knuchel, R. F., Gaillard, G., Michelsen, O., Müller‐Wenk, R., & Rydgren, B. (2006) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1065/lca2006.05.250 · Cited by 488
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Cederberg, C., Sonessonand, U., Flysjö, A., 2008. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from Brazilian beef exported to Europe. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on LCA in the Agrifood Sector, Zurich, Switzerland; November 12–14, 2008.
- Johnson DE, Phetteplace HW, Seidl AF, Schneider UA, McCarl BA. Management variations for U.S. beef production systems: effects on greenhouse gas emissions and profitability. Proceedings of the Third International Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation Conference; 17–21 November 2003, Beijing, China. Beijing: China Coal Information Institute; pp. 953–961.
- Pengue, 2006, Increasing roundup ready soybean export from Argentina (Box 1.1 in chapter 1)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nijdam, D., Rood, T., & Westhoek, H. (2012) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002 · Cited by 734
Meat consumption: Which are the current global risks? A review of recent (2010–2020) evidences
González, N., Marquès, M., Nadal, M., & Domingo, J. L. (2020) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109341 · Cited by 446
Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors
Lesschen, J. P., van den Berg, M., Westhoek, H., Witzke, P., & Oenema, O. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.058 · Cited by 396
Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution
Apostolidis, C., & McLeay, F. (2016) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.002 · Cited by 388
Energy Intensity of Agriculture and Food Systems
Pelletier, N. L., Audsley, E., Brodt, S. B., Garnett, T., Henriksson, P. J. G., Kendall, A. M., Kramer, K. J., Murphy, D. J., Nemecek, T., & Troell, M. F. (2011) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-081710-161014 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, T. L. T., Hermansen, J. E., & Mogensen, L.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Nguyen, Thu Lan T.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 756-766
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968798165
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 17.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- beef production, environmental impact of livestock, dairy calves, suckler herds, global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, land use, non-renewable energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, grazing, life cycle assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
