Cited by 734Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes

Nijdam, Durk, Rood, Trudy, Westhoek, Henk·2012·Food Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reviews and meta-analyses conclude that pasture-finished systems have higher average production emissions than grain-finished systems.

    “Reviews and meta-analyses of these studies conclude that pasture-finished systems have higher average production emissions [4, 6, 7].”
  • Nijdam et al. (42) provide midrange land use values for protein-rich food items.

    “Using the midrange values from Table 3 in Nijdam et al. (42), we estimated the land usage of the remaining protein-rich food items found in our audits.”

    From Valuing the multiple impacts of household food waste (2019) · cites this paper as [42]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nijdam, D., Rood, T., & Westhoek, H.
Affiliations
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
Corresponding author
Nijdam, Durk
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
760-770
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977558159
Cited by
734
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
carbon footprint, land use, animal protein, animal husbandry, aquaculture, fisheries, beef production, seafood production, pork, poultry, production systems, feed production, extensive cattle farming, environmental impact of food production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review