CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 68Climate change impacts on agricultureHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics

Widows: Agents of change in a climate of water uncertainty.

Gabrielsson, Sara, Ramasar, Vasna·2013·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.034
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.034

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women qualitatively reported perceived linkages between various illnesses and their water and sanitation environments, including diarrhea, vomiting, dysentery, cholera, hepatitis, schistosomiasis, and skin diseases due to polluted water, and diarrhea due to limitations on hygiene in times of water scarcity.

    “Women reported experiencing or fearing diarrhea, vomiting, dysentery, cholera, hepatitis, schistosomiasis, and skin diseases due to polluted water, [65,70,86,111,144,177,178,197,199,214,220,225,231,248,259,273,288] and experiencing diarrhea due to limitations on hygiene in times of water scarcity [70,123,202].”

    From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [65]

  • When women lacked control over income and assets, they had limited decision-making power over improving or accessing water sources; constrained finances limited women's access to preferred water sources, desired water quantity, and water treatment methods.

    “When women lacked control over income and assets, they had limited decision-making power over improving or accessing water sources [65,76,86,118,123,194,199,201,258,292].Constrained finances limited women's access to preferred water sources, [64,86,111,158,170,194,[197][198][199] desired water quantity, [86,192] and water treatment methods [86,111,118,204,293].”

    From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [65]

  • Women accessed social networks to address water and sanitation problems and take on roles, including lobbying officials, raising complaints with local authorities, leveraging village council connections to access latrine construction subsidies, and creating strategic alliances with male household members.

    “Women accessed social networks to address water and sanitation problems and take on roles [65,79,90,95,135,149,158,193].They used social networks to lobby officials to solve water problems (Thailand [193]), raise complaints with local authorities about water issues (Ecuador [79] and Nigeria [158]), leverage village council connections to access latrine construction subsidies (India [135]), and”

    From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [65]

  • Compromised water and sanitation environments have resulted in illness, infirmity, and bodily harm.

    “resulted in illness, infirmity, and bodily harm (_((((xxx))))_)[62, 63, 65, 70, 76, 78, 81, 86, 90, 101, 111, 118, 122, 123, 135, 141, 143, 144, 154, 158, 168-170, 172-174, 177-179, 181, 182, 184, 186-191, 195, 197-199, 201, 202, 208, 214, 220, 223, 225, 226, 231, 239-241, 244, 247, 256-259, 261, 272, 273, 276-278, 284, 285, 287, 288, 290, 296”

    From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [65]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Gabrielsson, S., & Ramasar, V.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Gabrielsson, Sara
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
60
Pages
34-42
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.034
OpenAlex
W2052531122
Cited by
68
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency
  • European Union through the 6th Framework Programme
  • The Craaford Foundation
  • The Gösta and Märta Moberg Research Fund
  • Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Keywords
widows, divorced women, HIV/AIDS, climate change adaptation, water stress, food security, women's livelihoods, household decision-making, bargaining power, rainwater harvesting, agroforestry, women's organizations, climate variability, Nyanza Province, Western Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review