Cited by 261Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementService and Product InnovationEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Environmental and economic benefits of Integrated Product Service Offerings quantified with real business cases

Open access
Lindahl, Mattias, Sundin, Erik, Sakao, Tomohiko·2014·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindahl, M., Sundin, E., & Sakao, T.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lindahl, Mattias
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
64
Pages
288-296
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086449432
Cited by
261
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
49.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Issue Lab (Candid) (submittedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
product-service systems, environmental benefits, economic benefits, life cycle assessment, life cycle cost analysis, remanufacturing, recycling, reuse, maintenance, business models, enabling factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review