Cited by 50Sustainable Design and DevelopmentSustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Exploratory study of the state of environmentally conscious design in the medical device industry

Open access
Moultrie, James, Sutcliffe, Laura, Maier, Anja·2015·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

This exploratory study seeks to explore the current state of design for the environment (DfE) in the development of medical devices ; an historically risk averse industry that lags behind others in terms of addressing environmental considerations. A cross-sectional survey of 34 medical device designers, primarily in the UK and USA , was conducted in order to fulfil this objective. Findings indicate that there is significant motivation to enhance DfE practice, but that there are multiple barriers to this. Major barriers identified are a perception of the high cost of DfE, the industry's current reliance on a single-use business model for many current products and a lack of education about DfE topics on all sides. Designers felt that the most significant opportunities to implement DfE are in situations where they are able to exert direct control, mainly in the early stages of the design process. Issues noted include raw material choice and packaging decisions. The nature of single use business models is also critical, pointing towards the needs for a systemic rather than product focus. For this to be achieved, financial rewards must be evident to firms and the changing regulatory landscape might also make a more significant impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.014

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Production and manufacturing of medical products results in at least 15% of the industry's greenhouse gases.

    “Because the production and manufacturing of medical products results in at least 15% of the industry's GHGs, this is an important group to engage and mobilize.”

    From How Ophthalmologists Can Decarbonize Eye Care (2023) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Introduction (p. 1) describes the environmental impact of medical devices and gives a medical-waste figure, but it does not quantify greenhouse-gas emissions. Searches for “15%,” “GHG emissions,” and manufacturing-related emissions found no passage assigning at least 15% of the industry's greenhouse gases to production or manufacturing. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Espicom, 2011a. The Outlook for Medical Devices in Western Europe. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-6526(1500734-9/sref29)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moultrie, J., Sutcliffe, L., & Maier, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Moultrie, James
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
108
Pages
363-376
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W773980804
Cited by
50
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (EP/E001769/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
design for the environment, medical devices, environmentally conscious design, preliminary design, environmental regulation, cleaner production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review