The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents an integrated literature review on how the environmental sustainability of distributed production is studied in a variety of disciplinary sources. The notion of distributed production suggests an alternative to mass production that differs in scale, location and consumer–producer relationship. Understanding its environmental implications (and thereby dematerialization potential) is regarded pertinent and timely. Key themes in the review included how distributed production can promote product longevity and closed material loops, as well as localizing production. New and closer ties between producer and consumer seemed central discussions but were underdeveloped with regard to sustainability potential. Empirical work was seen especially in research on Additive Manufacturing Processes, while the bulk of the studies were conceptual explorations with little testing in the real world as yet. This affirms the emerging nature of the topic and points to a clear need for more (and more diverse) empirical research. The review summarizes the opportunities for greater environmental sustainability as well as potential threats that could serve to guide and improve these novel practices today. It sets the stage for ‘distributed production’ to be examined as its own phenomenon by proposing how it can be characterized and suggests that a research agenda could build upon the work initiated here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The integrative review: updated methodology
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x · Cited by 10,241
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132319 · Cited by 7,449
Toffler, A. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,352
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
Benkler, Y. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127232 · Cited by 3,680
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
Torraco, R. J. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305278283 · Cited by 3,534 · cited 1×
“It is especially appropriate for new subjects where incorporating several theoretical domains is seen as a strategy to developing new conceptual models, research agendas and/or metatheories (Torraco, 2005).”
BackgroundClarifying the concept of Product-Service System
Mont, O. K. (2002) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/s0959-6526(01)00039-7 · Cited by 2,174
Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’
Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540509354673 · Cited by 2,075
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-0999 · Cited by 1,903
Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review
Huang, S. H., Liu, P., Mokasdar, A., & Hou, L. (2013) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 · Cited by 1,862
Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination.
Hart, C. (1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 1,378
Cited by
Sustainability of additive manufacturing: An overview on its energy demand and environmental impact
Peng, T., Kellens, K., Tang, R., Chen, C., & Chen, G. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.022 · Cited by 426
Review: The Impact of Metal Additive Manufacturing on the Aerospace Industry
Mohd Yusuf, S., Cutler, S., & Gao, N. (2019) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met9121286 · Cited by 332
Kellens, K., Baumers, M., Gutowski, T. G., Flanagan, W., Lifset, R., & Duflou, J. R. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12629 · Cited by 310
Circular futures: what will they look like
Bauwens, T., Hekkert, M., & Kirchherr, J. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106703 · Cited by 279
Liu, W., Liu, X., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Evans, S., & Yang, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15043827 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Kohtala, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 106
- Pages
- 654-668
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966554832
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 25.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.039
- The paper
- Kohtala, C. (2015). Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.