Cited by 2,174Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementService and Product InnovationEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Clarifying the concept of Product-Service System

Mont, O.K·2002·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-6526(01)00039-7

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mont, O. K.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Mont, O.K
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
237-245
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967736582
Cited by
2,174
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 183 · 2018: 166 · 2017: 162 · 2016: 145 · 2015: 147 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 130 · 2012: 110
FWCI
15.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
product-service systems, theoretical framework, environmental impact, sustainable business models, consumer acceptance, organizational structure, sustainable development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review