Cited by 943Biofuel production and bioconversionEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityBioenergy crop production and management

Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: The 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020

Macedo, Isaias C., Seabra, Joaquim E.A., Silva, João E.A.R.·2008·Biomass and Bioenergy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macedo, I. C., Seabra, J. E. A., & Silva, J. E. A. R.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Sugarcane Research Center (Brazil) (BR)
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
582-595
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980138005
Cited by
943
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 86
FWCI
46.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Keywords
sugarcane ethanol, greenhouse gas emissions, energy balance, avoided emissions, sugarcane bagasse, ethanol yield, sensitivity analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review