The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the success and widespread implementation of these practices will depend on the incentives to which the actors are exposed (Fischer and Pascucci, 2017).”
From Governance of the circular economy in the canned fish industry: A case study from Spain (2024) · cites this paper as Fischer and Pascucci, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Anderson, 2002, Cowboys and contracts, J. Leg. Stud., 31
- Ashton, 2008, Understanding the organization of industrial ecosystems, J. Industrial Ecol., 12, 34, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00002.x · DOI
- Ashton, 2009, The structure, function, and evolution of a regional industrial ecosystem, J. Industrial Ecol., 13, 228, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00111.x · DOI
- Baker, 2002, Relational contracts and the theory of the firm, Q. J. Econ., 117, 39, 10.1162/003355302753399445 · DOI
- Barker, 2007, Climate change 2007: an assessment of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Change, 446, 12
- Battilana, 2009, How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship, Acad. Manag. Ann., 3, 65, 10.1080/19416520903053598 · DOI
- Braungart, 2007, Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions - a strategy for eco-effective product and system design, J. Clean. Prod., 15, 1337, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003 · DOI
- Camerer, 1997, Progress in behavioral game theory, J. Econ. Perspect., 11, 167, 10.1257/jep.11.4.167 · DOI
- Coase, 1988, The nature of the firm: influence, J. Law, Econ. Organ., 4, 33
- Dacin, 2002, Institutional theory and institutional change: introduction to the special research forum, Acad. Manag. J., 45, 45, 10.5465/AMJ.2002.6283388 · DOI
- DiMaggio, 1983, The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationallity in organizational fields, Am. Sociol. Rev., 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
- Eisenhardt, 2007, Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges, Acad. Manag. J., 50, 25, 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888 · DOI · Paper page
- Gallopoulos, 2006, Industrial ecology: an overview, Prog. Industrial Ecol. Int. J., 3, 10, 10.1504/PIE.2006.010038 · DOI
- Grandori, 1997, An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes, Organ. Stud., 18, 897, 10.1177/017084069701800601 · DOI · Paper page
- Grandori, 1995, Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms, Organ. Stud., 16, 183, 10.1177/017084069501600201 · DOI · Paper page
- Grant, 1995, A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration, Acad. Manag., 1995, 17
- Greif, 1998, Historical and comparative institutional analysis, Am. Econ. Rev., 88, 80
- Groot, 2002, A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, Ecol. Econ., 41, 393, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Korhonen, 2001, Co-production of heat and power: an anchor tenant of a regional industrial ecosystem, J. Clean. Prod., 9, 509, 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00009-9 · DOI
- Korhonen, 2004, Industrial ecology in the strategic sustainable development model: strategic applications of industrial ecology, J. Clean. Prod., 12, 809, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.026 · DOI
- Lewandowski, 2016, Designing the business models for circular economy—towards the conceptual framework, Sustainability, 8, 43, 10.3390/su8010043 · DOI
- Lozano, 2014, A review of ‘theories of the firm’and their contributions to Corporate Sustainability, J. Clean. Prod., 106, 430, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.007 · DOI
- Murray, 2015, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics, 1
- Ostrom, 2011, Background on the institutional analysis and development framework, Policy Stud. J., 39, 7, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x · DOI · Paper page
- Pacheco, 2010, The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: a tale of two theories, J. Manag., 36, 974
- Preston, 2012, A global redesign? shaping the circular economy, Energy, Environ. Resour. Gov., 2, 1
- Smol, 2015, The possible use of sewage sludge ash (SSA) in the construction industry as a way towards a circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 95, 45, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.051 · DOI
- Toxopeus, 2015, Cradle to cradle: effective vision vs. Efficient practice?, Procedia CIRP, 29, 384, 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.068 · DOI
- Tukker, 2013, Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy–a review, J. Clean. Prod., 97, 76
- van Weelden, 2016, Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market, J. Clean. Prod., 113, 743, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.065 · DOI
- Wassenaar, 2015, Reconsidering industrial metabolism: from analogy to denoting actuality, J. Industrial Ecol., 19, 715, 10.1111/jiec.12349 · DOI
- Williamson, 2000, The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead, J. Econ. Literature, 38, 595, 10.1257/jel.38.3.595 · DOI
- Williamson, 2002, The theory of the firm as governance structure: from choice to contract, J. Econ. Perspect., 171, 10.1257/089533002760278776 · DOI
- http://srmo.sagepub.com, retrieved May 28th 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jabbour, C. J. C., Godinho Filho, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8 · Cited by 1,116
Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains
Ciulli, F., Kolk, A., & Boe-Lillegraven, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04160-5 · Cited by 310
Schultz, F. C., Valentinov, V., Kirchherr, J., Reinhardt, R. J., & Pies, I. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3592 · Cited by 82
A Traceability Framework to Enable Circularity in the Built Environment
Davari, S., Jaberi, M., Yousfi, A., & Poirier, E. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15108278 · Cited by 32
Governance of the circular economy in the canned fish industry: A case study from Spain
Fernández-González, R., Teixeira Pereira, Z. G., & Ricoy-Casas, R. M. (2024) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2024.103618 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, A., & Pascucci, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 155
- Pages
- 17-32
- ISSN
- 0959-6526
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review