Environmental impacts of wood-based products under consideration of cascade utilization: A systematic literature review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The material's circularity can be achieved to reduce the environmental impact of wood waste landfilling.
“Thus, the material's circularity can be achieved to reduce the environmental impact of wood waste landfilling [112].”
From Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [112]
Cites
LCA-based optimization of wood utilization under special consideration of a cascading use of wood
Höglmeier, K., Steubing, B., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.018 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Höglmeier, K., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K. (2014) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0774-6 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Sikkema, R., Junginger, M., McFarlane, P., & Faaij, A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.007 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns
Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12763 · Cited by 1,256 · see citing works
Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy: What can we learn from wood cascading?
Jarre, M., Petit-Boix, A., Priefer, C., Meyer, R., & Leipold, S. (2020) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.017 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“In their review of LCA publications on wood cascading, Thonemann and Schumann (2018) note that assessments focus on either single or multiple steps of the cascading system, which generates a variety of results.”
BackgroundCircular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach
Jahan, I., Zhang, G., Bhuiyan, M., & Navaratnam, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710478 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Piccardo, C., & Hughes, M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133083 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Circular Economy Practices on Wood Panels: A Bibliographic Analysis
de Carvalho Araújo, C. K., Salvador, R., Moro Piekarski, C., Sokulski, C. C., de Francisco, A. C., & de Carvalho Araújo Camargo, S. K. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11041057 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Risse, M., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.045 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Schulte, M., Hammar, T., Stendahl, J., Seleborg, M., & Hansson, P. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12894 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thonemann, N., & Schumann, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Thonemann, Nils
- ORCID
- Thonemann, Nils
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 172
- Pages
- 4181-4188
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2567066295
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- German Research Foundation (GRK 1703/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- cascade utilization, wood products, environmental impact, life cycle assessment, functional units, system boundaries, global warming, primary energy consumption, land use, eutrophication, acidification, resource efficiency, wood waste
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
