The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recovery of valuable materials from spent lithium-ion batteries by mechanical separation and thermal treatment
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, a mechanical separation and thermal treatment process is developed to recover valuable metals and graphite from the −0.25 mm crushed products of spent lithium-ion batteries (LiBs). Effect of key parameters for roasting such as the temperature and roasting time are investigated to determine the most efficient conditions for surface modification of the mixed electrode materials by roasting. The roasted mixed electrode materials are separated by flotation operation to recover the cathode material and anode materials respectively. The results show that most of the organic outer layer coated on the surface of the mixed electrode materials can be removed at the temperature of 450 °C for 15 min. After roasting treatment, the original wettability of LiCoO2 and graphite is regained. The −0.25 mm crushed products of spent LiBs can be separated into LiCoO2 concentrate and graphite concentrate by flotation process efficiently. The enrichment ratios of Co, Mn, Cu and Al are 1.35, 1.29, 1.25 and 1.19, their recovery rates are 97.66%, 93.66%, 90.14% and 86.29%, respectively. This process proposed for the recovery of valuable materials is simple and of high efficient for the spent lithium-ion batteries recycling industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Choubey, P. K., Chung, K.-S., Kim, M.-S., Lee, J.-C., & Srivastava, R. R. (2017) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2017.04.008 · Cited by 290
Zhang, T., He, Y., Wang, F., Ge, L., Zhu, X., & Li, H. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.01.002 · Cited by 246
Self-citation
Cited by
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Mossali, E., Picone, N., Gentilini, L., Rodrìguez, O., Pérez, J. M., & Colledani, M. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110500 · Cited by 574
Or, T., Gourley, S. W. D., Kaliyappan, K., Yu, A., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Carbon Energy · doi:10.1002/cey2.29 · Cited by 559
Progresses in Sustainable Recycling Technology of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Du, K., Ang, E. H., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12271 · Cited by 458
A comprehensive review on the pretreatment process in lithium-ion battery recycling
Kim, S., Bang, J., Yoo, J., Shin, Y., Bae, J., Jeong, J., Kim, K., Dong, P., & Kwon, K. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126329 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, F., Zhang, T., He, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y., & Feng, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 185
- Pages
- 646-652
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789963791
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery of valuable materials from spent lithium-ion batteries by mechanical separation and thermal treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.069
- The paper
- Wang, F., Zhang, T., He, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y., & Feng, Y. (2018). Recovery of valuable materials from spent lithium-ion batteries by mechanical separation and thermal treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
