Cited by 163Innovation and Knowledge ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessQuality and Management Systems

Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management

Open access
Hamdoun, Mohamed, Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose, Ben Othman, Hanen·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.031

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamdoun, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Ben Othman, H.
Affiliations
Dhofar University (OM)
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
193
Pages
759-770
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801723208
Cited by
163
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 7
FWCI
33.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Quality and Management Systems
Keywords
knowledge transfer, organizational innovation, quality management, environmental management, business innovation, Tunisian companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review