Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging – A cross-cultural comparative study

Herbes, Carsten, Beuthner, Christoph, Ramme, Iris·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Growing awareness of the environmental damage associated with conventional product packaging has led to keen interest in ‘green’, ‘environmentally friendly’ or ‘sustainable’ packaging. Research tells us a great deal about how the ‘environmental friendliness’ of a package may influence a consumer purchasing decision, but we have little scientific insight into the attributes that shape consumer perceptions of ’environmental friendliness. Hence, we examined how the interplay of environmentally friendly packaging attributes influences an overall evaluation of environmental friendliness, surveying attitudes from three Western consumer cultures: Germany, France, and the U.S. We found that consumers focus predominantly on end-of-life attributes of packaging, although the cultures differ in how they weigh the relative value of recyclability, reusability and biodegradability. We found that consumers concern themselves less with renewable origins, and almost not at all with activities relating to production, transport and retail use. We also found that widespread misunderstanding of biomethane continues to exist; further, the fact that biomethane is ‘biobased’ counts little in consumer ratings if the product is not also ‘biodegradable’. Ethical concerns about the use of agricultural land to produce biogas substrates are raised primarily by German consumers. A comparison with results from LCA studies of packaging revealed a number of discrepancies between consumer perception and facts on the environmental impact of different packaging options. Brand owners advancing environmentally friendly packaging initiatives are advised to feature those eco-advantages that pertain to the post-use phase and to differentiate packaging strategies across countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.106

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Herbes, C., Beuthner, C., & Ramme, I.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
194
Pages
203-218
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803471187
Cited by
256
References
92
FWCI
38.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging – A cross-cultural comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.106
The paper
Herbes, C., Beuthner, C., & Ramme, I. (2018). Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging – A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.