The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging – A cross-cultural comparative study
Abstract
Abstract Growing awareness of the environmental damage associated with conventional product packaging has led to keen interest in ‘green’, ‘environmentally friendly’ or ‘sustainable’ packaging. Research tells us a great deal about how the ‘environmental friendliness’ of a package may influence a consumer purchasing decision, but we have little scientific insight into the attributes that shape consumer perceptions of ’environmental friendliness. Hence, we examined how the interplay of environmentally friendly packaging attributes influences an overall evaluation of environmental friendliness, surveying attitudes from three Western consumer cultures: Germany, France, and the U.S. We found that consumers focus predominantly on end-of-life attributes of packaging, although the cultures differ in how they weigh the relative value of recyclability, reusability and biodegradability. We found that consumers concern themselves less with renewable origins, and almost not at all with activities relating to production, transport and retail use. We also found that widespread misunderstanding of biomethane continues to exist; further, the fact that biomethane is ‘biobased’ counts little in consumer ratings if the product is not also ‘biodegradable’. Ethical concerns about the use of agricultural land to produce biogas substrates are raised primarily by German consumers. A comparison with results from LCA studies of packaging revealed a number of discrepancies between consumer perception and facts on the environmental impact of different packaging options. Brand owners advancing environmentally friendly packaging initiatives are advised to feature those eco-advantages that pertain to the post-use phase and to differentiate packaging strategies across countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,312
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
Krippendorff, K. (2019) · doi:10.4135/9781071878781 · Cited by 15,448
A METHOD FOR JUDGING ALL CONTRASTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE*
SCHEFFÉ, H. (1953) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/40.1-2.87 · Cited by 1,705
Collaborative and Iterative Translation: An Alternative Approach to Back Translation
Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. (2007) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jimk.15.1.030 · Cited by 989
A Method for Judging all Contrasts in the Analysis of Variance
Scheffe, H. (1953) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2333100 · Cited by 915
Chen, C., Lee, S.-Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x · Cited by 873
Prakash, G., & Pathak, P. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.116 · Cited by 632
Shen, Y., Linville, J. L., Urgun-Demirtas, M., Mintz, M. M., & Snyder, S. W. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.129 · Cited by 556
Challenges and opportunities of biodegradable plastics: a mini review
Rujnić-Sokele, M., & Pilipović, A. (2017) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x16683272 · Cited by 550
Steenis, N. D., van Herpen, E., van der Lans, I. A., Ligthart, T. N., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.036 · Cited by 493
Cited by
Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging - A systematic review
Ketelsen, M., Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120123 · Cited by 454
Sustainable and Bio-Based Food Packaging: A Review on Past and Current Design Innovations
Versino, F., Ortega, F., Monroy, Y., Rivero, S., López, O. V., & García, M. A. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12051057 · Cited by 422
Consumer Considerations for the Implementation of Sustainable Packaging: A Review
Boz, Z., Korhonen, V., & Koelsch Sand, C. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062192 · Cited by 394
Sustainable packaging for supply chain management in the circular economy: A review
Meherishi, L., Narayana, S. A., & Ranjani, K. S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.057 · Cited by 341
Public attitudes towards bioplastics – knowledge, perception and end-of-life management
Dilkes-Hoffman, L., Ashworth, P., Laycock, B., Pratt, S., & Lant, P. (2019) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104479 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Herbes, C., Beuthner, C., & Ramme, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 194
- Pages
- 203-218
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2803471187
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 38.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging – A cross-cultural comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.106
- The paper
- Herbes, C., Beuthner, C., & Ramme, I. (2018). Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging – A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.