Cited by 989Survey Methodology and NonresponseTranslation Studies and PracticesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Collaborative and Iterative Translation: An Alternative Approach to Back Translation

Douglas, Susan P., Craig, C. Samuel·2007·Journal of International Marketing

Abstract

Back translation is the technique most commonly used to check the accuracy of translation in survey research. Although it results in a direct or literal translation, it does not address issues of conceptual equivalence. Furthermore, if it is not combined with pretesting, it does not address issues of comprehension and meaning to the respondent. This article discusses some of the problems of relying exclusively on back translation in isolation. It suggests the use of a collaborative, iterative approach for translating questionnaires for international marketing research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jimk.15.1.030

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Marketing and International Business
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Douglas, Susan P.
  • Craig, C. Samuel
Venue
Journal of International Marketing
Published
2007-03
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
30-43
ISSN
  • 1069-031X (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7215
OpenAlex
W2142988015
Cited by
989
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 15
FWCI
26.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of International Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
back-translation, questionnaire translation, collaborative translation, conceptual equivalence, translation accuracy, pretesting, international marketing research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review