Cited by 26Environmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and Development

Consumer buying behaviour of sustainable vacuum cleaners—Consequences for design and marketing

Open access
Visser, Mirjam, Schoormans, Jan, Vogtländer, Joost·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.114

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Established findings from environmental psychology show that pro-environmental affect frequently outpaces factual confidence and behavioral readiness, and evidence indicates that performance uncertainty about sustainable materials persistently tempers consumer commitment.

    “The pattern echoes established findings from environmental psychology, where pro-environmental affect frequently outpaces factual confidence and behavioral readiness [33], and aligns with evidence that performance uncertainty about sustainable materials persistently tempers consumer commitment [24,34].”

    From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Baumann, H., Boons, F., Bragd, A., 2002. Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production 10, 409-425.
  2. Brown, M., 2015. Innovative energy-efficiency policies: an international review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 4, 1-25.
  3. Carrington, M.J., Neville, B.A., Whitwell, G.J., 2010. Why Ethical Consumers Don't Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 97, 139-158.
  4. Coronado Palma, N., Visser, M., 2012. Sustainability creates business and brand value. Journal of Brand Strategy 1, 217-222.
  5. Creusen, M.E.H., Schoormans, J.P.L., 2005. The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice*. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22, 63-81.
  6. Dangelico, R.M., Vocalelli, D., 2017. "Green Marketing": An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production 165, 1263-1279.
  7. De Angelis, M., Adıgüzel, F., Amatulli, C., 2017. The role of design similarity in consumers' evaluation of new green products: An investigation of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Cleaner Production 141, 1515-1527.
  8. Ellen, P.S., 1994. Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro- ecological behaviors. Journal of Business Research 30, 43-52.
  9. Elmustapha, H., Hoppe, T., Bressers, H., 2018. Consumer renewable energy technology adoption decision-making; comparing models on perceived attributes and attitudinal constructs in the case of solar water heaters in Lebanon. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 347-357.
  10. European Union, 2013. Implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for vacuum cleaners, in: Commision, E.U. (Ed.), Brussels.
  11. Hüttel, A., Ziesemer, F., Peyer, M., Balderjahn, I., 2018. To purchase or not? Why consumers make economically (non-)sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Cleaner Production 174, 827-836.
  12. Jansson, J., Nordlund, A., Westin, K., 2017. Examining drivers of sustainable consumption: The influence of norms and opinion leadership on electric vehicle adoption in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production 154, 176-187.
  13. Lehner, M., Mont, O., Heiskanen, E., 2016. Nudging -A promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? Journal of Cleaner Production 134, 166-177.
  14. Lorek, S., Spangenberg, J.H., 2014. Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy -beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production 63, 33-44.
  15. Luchs, M.G., Naylor, R.W., Irwin, J.R., Raghunathan, R., 2010. The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference. Journal of Marketing 74, 18-31.
  16. McDonald, S., Oates, C., Thyne, M., Alevizou, P., McMorland, L.A., 2009. Comparing sustainable consumption patterns across product sectors. International Journal of Consumer Studies 33, 137-145.
  17. McDonald, S., Oates, C.J., Alevizou, P.J., Young, C.W., Hwang, K., 2012. Individual strategies for sustainable consumption. Journal of Marketing Management 28, 445-468.
  18. Mont, O., Plepys, A., 2008. Sustainable consumption progress: should we be proud or alarmed? Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 531-537.
  19. Mugge, R., Dahl, D.W., 2013. Seeking the Ideal Level of Design Newness: Consumer Response to Radical and Incremental Product Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30, 34-47.
  20. Mugge, R., Dahl, D.W., Schoormans, J.P.L., 2017. "What You See, Is What You Get?" Guidelines for Influencing Consumers' Perceptions of Consumer Durables through Product Appearance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, n/a-n/a.
  21. Mugge, R., Schoormans, J.P.L., 2012. Newer is better! The influence of a novel appearance on the perceived performance quality of products. Journal of Engineering Design 23, 469-484.
  22. Rex, E., Baumann, H., 2007. Beyond ecolabels: what green marketing can learn from conventional marketing. Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 567-576.
  23. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., 2013. Using multivariate statistics, 6th ed. Pearson Education, Boston.
  24. van Doorn, J., Verhoef, P.C., 2011. Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods. International Journal of Research in Marketing 28, 167-180.
  25. Vogtländer, J.G., Bijma, A., Brezet, H.C., 2002. Communicating the eco-efficiency of products and services by means of the eco-costs/value model. Journal of Cleaner Production 10, 57-67.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Visser, M., Schoormans, J., & Vogtländer, J.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Visser, Mirjam
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
195
Pages
664-673
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804268931
Cited by
26
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
consumer buying behaviour, sustainable products, vacuum cleaners, energy efficiency, green purchasing, purchase decision factors, product design, energy efficiency legislation, brand messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review