Cited by 178scientometrics and bibliometrics researchSustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Industrial Ecology

Circular economy scientific knowledge in the European Union and China: a bibliometric, network and survey analysis (2006–2016)

Open access
Türkeli, Serdar, Kemp, René, Huang, Beijia, Bleischwitz, Raimund, McDowall, Will·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.118

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature search covered the past 22 years, starting at the year 2000, because the concept of circular economy started to emerge then.

    “The literature in the past 22 years was searched, starting at the year 2000 as the concept of circular economy started to emerge (Türkeli et al., 2018).”

    From Packaging design for the circular economy: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Türkeli et al., 2018

    The paper's Concluding Remarks say the circular-economy concept took shape in the United States in the 1960s and that the term appeared in China in the mid-1990s—not that the concept began to emerge in 2000. The 22-year literature search describes the citing authors' own method, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chertow, M. R. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annual review of energy and the environment, 25(1), 313-337.
  2. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) (2012), "Towards the Circular Economy -Vol. 1: An economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition" ( https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/towards-the-circular-economy-vol-1- aneconomic-and-business-rationale-for-an-accelerated-transition).
  3. Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity (pp. 206-219).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Türkeli, S., Kemp, R., Huang, B., Bleischwitz, R., & McDowall, W.
Affiliations
  • United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL)
  • University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Türkeli, Serdar
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
197
Pages
1244-1261
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808251879
Cited by
178
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
FWCI
14.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NWO (467-14-154)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71461137008, 71690241, 71403170)
  • UK Economic and Social Science Research Council (ES/L015838/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Keywords
circular economy, research trends, international research cooperation, co-authorship networks, citation analysis, research funding, resource efficiency, zero waste, sustainable cities, resource security, critical raw materials, business models, China, European Union

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review