The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: Evidence from China
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The literature on the relationship between environmental regulations (ERs) and environmental performance (EP) of firms has largely ignored consideration of different kinds of ERs and the potential non-linear relationship between ERs and EP. This study uses the literature to differentiate three types of ERs (command-and-control regulations, market-based regulations and informal regulations) and further investigates (i) the linear links between different types of ERs and EP, and (ii) the potential non-linear relationships. The results provide support that the links between ERs and EP are not linear for command-and-control regulations and market-based regulations but non-linear and positive. For informal regulations, both the linear and non-linear relationships are not significant. We further test the impacts of time lag effects. Command-and-control regulations have impacts on EP both in current and the preceding years, whereas market-based regulations only affect EP in current year rather than in the preceding years. It takes 2 years to see the effects of informal regulations on EP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
A RESOURCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE ON CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND PROFITABILITY.
RUSSO, M. V., & FOUTS, P. A. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257052 · Cited by 4,805
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003 · Cited by 3,570
INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS
Jones, T. M. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924 · Cited by 3,102
Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development
Bansal, P. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.441 · Cited by 2,879
The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance
Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1199 · Cited by 2,725
Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory
Roberts, R. W. (1992) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-k · Cited by 2,322
Cited by
Peng, H., Shen, N., Ying, H., & Wang, Q. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128044 · Cited by 412
Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.055 · Cited by 335
Qiu, S., Wang, Z., & Geng, S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112282 · Cited by 299
Etse, D., McMurray, A., & Muenjohn, N. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04752-0 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, R., & Ramanathan, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 196
- Pages
- 1329-1340
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2808549782
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 32.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: Evidence from China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.132
- The paper
- Li, R., & Ramanathan, R. (2018). Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
