The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recycling glass fiber thermoplastic composites from wind turbine blades
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Thermoplastic resin systems have long been discussed for use in large-scale composite parts but have yet to be exploited by the energy industry. The use of these resins versus their thermosetting counterparts can potentially introduce cost savings due to non-heated tooling, shorter manufacturing cycle times, and recovery of raw materials from the retired part. Because composite parts have high embedded energy, recovery of their constituent materials can provide substantial economic benefit. This study determines the feasibility of recycling composite wind turbine blade components that are fabricated with glass fiber reinforced Elium® thermoplastic resin. Several experiments are conducted to tabulate important material properties that are relevant to recycling, including thermal degradation, grinding, and dissolution of the polymer matrix to recover the constituent materials. Dissolution, which is a process unique to thermoplastic matrices, allows recovery of both the polymer matrix and full-length glass fibers, which maintain their stiffness (190 N/(mm g)) and strength (160 N/g) through the recovery process. Injection molded regrind material is stiffer (12 GPa compared to 10 GPa) and stronger (150 MPa compared to 84 MPa) than virgin material that had shorter fibers. An economic analysis of the technical data shows that recycling thermoplastic–glass fiber composites via dissolution into their constituent parts is commercially feasible under certain conditions. This analysis concludes that 50% of the glass fiber must be recovered and resold for a price of $0.28/kg. Additionally, 90% of the resin must be recovered and resold at a price of $2.50/kg.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading
Bridgwater, A. V. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048 · Cited by 4,856
Updating and further expanding GSK's solvent sustainability guide
Alder, C. M., Hayler, J. D., Henderson, R. K., Redman, A. M., Shukla, L., Shuster, L. E., & Sneddon, H. F. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c6gc00611f · Cited by 1,041
Cited by
Grand challenges in the science of wind energy
Veers, P., Dykes, K., Lantz, E., Barth, S., Bottasso, C. L., Carlson, O., Clifton, A., Green, J., Green, P., Holttinen, H., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau2027 · Cited by 1,242
Karuppannan Gopalraj, S., & Kärki, T. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2195-4 · Cited by 452
Msigwa, G., Ighalo, J. O., & Yap, P.-S. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157755 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Cousins, D. S., Suzuki, Y., Murray, R. E., Samaniuk, J. R., & Stebner, A. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 209
- Pages
- 1252-1263
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898428109
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recycling glass fiber thermoplastic composites from wind turbine blades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.286
- The paper
- Cousins, D. S., Suzuki, Y., Murray, R. E., Samaniuk, J. R., & Stebner, A. P. (2019). Recycling glass fiber thermoplastic composites from wind turbine blades. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.286
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.