The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions
Abstract
Abstract Research on sustainable consumption has gained much popularity in the past few years, and the of the green gap phenomenon has had its share of studies. This phenomenon is known as the discrepancy between what consumers say about their growing concern regarding the environment, on the one hand, and what they truly do to help sustain this environment, on the other hand. Although reviews of the motivations and barriers of green consumption are available in the literature, none of them focuses on the green gap, nor examines the methodologies and paradigms used in the available studies. Given the importance of methodology in creating the green gap, and considering the effect of the adopted paradigm on the reliability of the results, it is essential to identify these two aspects in each reviewed study. In this work, we use a pre-assigned framework to categorize 58 articles addressing the green gap, based on the theory, methodology, and paradigm applied in each article. An overview of the studies shows that despite the diversity of methods used, there is still room for improvement in terms of methodology, paradigm, and theory. Most importantly, qualitative studies and experimental designs are needed, and the rational paradigm must not be replaced by but should instead complement the current trend that favors the behavioral economic. As for the theoretical improvements, the research focus must shift from exploring the reasons behind the gap to implementing solutions to it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · cited 2×
“Johnstone and Tan, 2015b)), as well as Hamm Ulrich who participated as a third author in one study (Buder et al., 2014), and as a second author in another study (Sch€aufele and Hamm, 2018).”
BackgroundNudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-0977 · Cited by 11,572
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504620220145401 · Cited by 8,866
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018963 · Cited by 6,618
Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model
Digman, J. M. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 · Cited by 6,436
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524
(2008) · Australian journal of advanced nursing · Cited by 1,687
Cited by
Shimul, A. S., Cheah, I., & Khan, B. B. (2022) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2021.1934770 · Cited by 164
Qi, X., Yu, H., & Ploeger, A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17197106 · Cited by 141
Analysis of factors influencing residents' waste sorting behavior: A case study of Shanghai
Govindan, K., Zhuang, Y., & Chen, G. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131126 · Cited by 134
Sustainable clothing: Why conspicuous consumption and greenwashing matter
Apaolaza, V., Policarpo, M. C., Hartmann, P., Paredes, M. R., & D'Souza, C. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3335 · Cited by 92
Grappe, C. G., Lombart, C., Louis, D., & Durif, F. (2021) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/ijrdm-12-2020-0489 · Cited by 57
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dubé, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 275
- Pages
- 122556
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3036225339
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556
- The paper
- ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dubé, L. (2020). Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.