Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on municipal solid waste as a renewable source for waste-to-energy project in India: Current practices, challenges, and future opportunities

Chand Malav, Lal, Yadav, Krishna Kumar, Gupta, Neha, Kumar, Sandeep, Sharma, Gulshan Kumar, Krishnan, Santhana, Rezania, Shahabaldin, Kamyab, Hesam, Pham, Quoc Bao, Yadav, Shalini, Bhattacharyya, Suparna, Yadav, Virendra Kumar, Bach, Quang-Vu·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Waste generation is steadily growing in developing countries such as India due to the continuous growth of industrialization, urbanization, and population. Mismanagement of municipal solid waste (MSW) not only has negative environmental effects but also causes the risk to public health and raises some other socio-economic issues that are worth discussions. Therefore, it is essential to urgently enhance the handling of waste collection, segregation, and safe disposal. Waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies such as pyrolysis, gasification, incineration, and biomethanation can convert MSW, as an appropriate source of renewable energy, into useful energy (electricity and heat) in safe and eco-friendly ways. This review aims at (1) describing the challenges of MSW management, (2) summarizing the health significance of MSW management, (3) explaining the opportunities and requirements of energy recovery from MSW through WtE technologies, (4) explaining several WtE technologies in detail, and (5) discussing the current status of WtE technologies in India. The paper also discusses the challenges to WtE projects in India. Moreover, a number of recommendations are provided for improving the currently implemented solid waste management (SWM) in the Indian context. This review has the potential of helping scholars, researchers, authorities, and stakeholders working on MSW management to make effective decisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123227

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Chand Malav, L., Yadav, K. K., Gupta, N., Kumar, S., Sharma, G. K., Krishnan, S., Rezania, S., Kamyab, H., Pham, Q. B., Yadav, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Yadav, V. K., & Bach, Q.-V.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
277
Pages
123227
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3043665944
Cited by
406
References
70
FWCI
33.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on municipal solid waste as a renewable source for waste-to-energy project in India: Current practices, challenges, and future opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123227
The paper
Chand Malav, L., Yadav, K. K., Gupta, N., Kumar, S., Sharma, G. K., Krishnan, S., Rezania, S., Kamyab, H., Pham, Q. B., Yadav, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Yadav, V. K., & Bach, Q.-V. (2020). A review on municipal solid waste as a renewable source for waste-to-energy project in India: Current practices, challenges, and future opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123227

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.