Cited by 90Phosphorus and nutrient managementWastewater Treatment and ReuseAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Challenges and opportunities of nutrient recovery from human urine using biochar for fertilizer applications

Pathy, Abhijeet, Ray, Jyotiprakash, Paramasivan, Balasubramanian·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127019

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 175 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pathy, A., Ray, J., & Paramasivan, B.
Affiliations
National Institute of Technology Rourkela (IN)
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
304
Pages
127019
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3145550463
Cited by
90
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 3
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
nutrient recovery, human urine, biochar, phosphorus adsorption, nitrogen adsorption, source-separated urine, slow-release fertilizer, engineered biochar, wastewater treatment, eutrophication, soil conditioning, urine contamination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review