Cited by 369Environmental Impact and SustainabilityChemistry and Chemical EngineeringLife Cycle Costing Analysis

Integration of techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment for sustainable process design – A review

Mahmud, Roksana, Moni, Sheikh Moniruzzaman, High, Karen, Carbajales-Dale, Michael·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128247

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahmud, R., Moni, S. M., High, K., & Carbajales-Dale, M.
Affiliations
Clemson University (US)
Corresponding author
Mahmud, Roksana
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
317
Pages
128247
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3179688523
Cited by
369
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 6
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Life Cycle Costing Analysis
Keywords
techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment, sustainable process design, economic-environmental trade-off, emerging technologies, technology readiness level, functional unit selection, uncertainty, data availability, optimization, stakeholder communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review