Cited by 161Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

Implementation of circular economy approaches in the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) sector: Barriers, enablers and policy insights

Open access
Rizos, Vasileios, Bryhn, Julie·2022·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Circular economy business models (CBMs) are identified as important levers in the transition to a circular economy (CE). In recent years, a growing body of research has examined the barriers and enablers to these models, however, the available empirical evidence is still limited while sector-specific assessments are lacking. Our study aims to enrich the research in this field by identifying barriers and enablers to the implementation of a variety of CBMs in the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) sector. Based on this analysis, we provide several policy insights. The EEE sector has been chosen as the focus of this study as a sector with large untapped potential in implementing circularity practices. The study adopts a multi-case study approach and uses a sample of 31 cases developed through the CIRC4Life EU-funded project and the snowball sampling method. To our knowledge, this represents the largest case study sample used to examine CE approaches in the EEE sector. Our findings show that despite the various policy instruments in place to boost the CE transition in this sector, there exist gaps which require policy attention. These include lack of rules for transparency across supply chains, weak enforcement of EU waste legislation rules, limited use of circularity criteria in public tenders and lack of CE standards. Inconsistent requirements stemming from different policy domains can also pose challenges for companies adopting CE practices. Among the suggested actions that can facilitate CE practices include knowledge sharing platforms and business partnerships, R&D project grants, product CE labels, financial incentives and awareness-raising campaigns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130617

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interconnected barriers spanning financial, market, operational, organisational, policy, technological and intrinsic domains pose substantial systemic inertia, impeding CE implementation.

    “However, interconnected barriers spanning financial, market, operational, organisational, policy, technological and intrinsic domains pose substantial systemic inertia, impeding CE implementation (Tura et al. 2019;Vermunt et al. 2019;Rizos and Bryhn 2022).”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Rizos and Bryhn 2022

    Section 2 identifies multiple financial, supply-chain, technological, consumer, organisational and policy barriers, and section 6 says no single policy instrument can address them all. Section 4.6 also describes an internal focus on linear processes that cannot easily change. The paper does not identify the quoted seven-domain classification, particularly a separate “intrinsic” domain, and its findings focus on the EEE sector rather than CE implementation generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The shift to a recurring revenue model introduces new complexities for value capture, necessitating different adjusted risk management strategies compared to traditional sales.

    “Finally, the shift to a recurring revenue model introduces new complexities for value capture, necessitating different adjusted risk management strategies compared to traditional sales (Rizos and Bryhn 2022;Hunger et al. 2024).”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Rizos and Bryhn 2022

    Section 2.1 (page unavailable) says circular business models can add complexity compared with linear models, including questions about ownership and how costs and benefits are shared. Sections 4.2 and 4.6 discuss leasing opportunities and the need for new internal processes. The copy does not establish that recurring revenue specifically creates these complexities or that it requires different risk-management strategies from traditional sales. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Efficiently managed take-back and refurbishment systems within a product-service system can turn extended producer responsibility obligations into value recovery opportunities, whereas high-quality, accessible service offerings can build brand loyalty in line with right-to-repair mandates, rather than treating them merely as compliance burdens.

    “For instance, efficiently managed take-back and refurbishment systems within a PSS can turn EPR obligations into value recovery opportunities, whereas high-quality, accessible service offerings can build brand loyalty in line with RtR mandates, rather than treating them merely as compliance burdens (Rizos and Bryhn 2022).”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Rizos and Bryhn 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fostering a sense of active partnership is fundamental to enabling business models that equitably share the costs and benefits resulting from a transition towards a circular economy.

    “Fostering this sense of active partnership is fundamental to enabling business models that equitably share the costs and benefits resulting from a transition towards a CE (Rizos and Bryhn 2022).”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Rizos and Bryhn 2022

    Section 2.1 (page unavailable) says successful implementation of circular business models is largely contingent on collaboration among supply-chain actors and identifies sharing costs and benefits as a challenge. Section 4.3 (page unavailable) also reports partnerships as a key enabler. Neither passage establishes that partnership produces business models that share those costs and benefits equitably. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Business model innovations that shift from product sales to service-based offerings align strongly with theoretical arguments positioning them as pivotal circular economy enablers.

    “By contrast, BMIs that shift from product sales to service-based offerings align strongly with theoretical arguments positioning them as pivotal CE enablers (Rizos and Bryhn 2022;Conduit et al. 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Abdelbasir, S.M., El-Sheltawy, C.T., Abdo, D.M., 2018. Green processes for electronic waste recycling: a review. J. Sustain. Metall. 4, 295-311.
  2. Aranda-Usón, A., Portillo-Tarragona, P., Marín-Vinuesa, L.M., Scarpellini, S., 2019. Financial resources for the circular economy: a perspective from businesses. Sustainability 11 (3), 888.
  3. Beuren, F.H., Gomes Ferreira, M.G., Cauchick Miguel, P.A., 2013. Product-service systems: a literature review on integrated products and services. J. Clean. Prod. 47, 222-231.
  4. Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P., Evans, S., 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 42-56.
  5. Borthakur, A., 2020. Policy approaches on E-waste in the emerging economies: a review of the existing governance with special reference to India and South Africa. J. Clean. Prod. 252, 119885.
  6. Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C., Pettersen, I.N., 2018. Consumption in the circular economy: a literature review. Sustainability 10 (8), 2758.
  7. De Mattos, C.A., De Albuquerque, T.L.M., 2018. Enabling factors and strategies for the transition toward a circular economy (CE). Sustainability 10 (12), 4628.
  8. European Commission, 2003. ''Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 Concerning the Definition of Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises''. Official Journal of the European Union.
  9. Govindan, K., Hasanagic, M., 2018. A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56, 278-311.
  10. Lewandowski, M., 2016. Designing the business models for circular economy -towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability 8 (1), 43.
  11. Lieder, M., Rashid, A., 2016. Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 115, 36-51.
  12. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook, second ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  13. Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K., 2015. ''Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research'', Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services, 42, pp. 533-544.
  14. Pagoropoulos, A., Pigossoa, D.C.A., McAloone, T.C., 2017. The emergent role of digital technologies in the Circular Economy: a review. Procedia CIRP 64, 19-24.
  15. Rademaekers, K., Asaad, S.S.Z., Berg, J., 2011. Study on the Competitiveness of the European Companies and Resource Efficiency. ECORYS, Teknologisk Institut, Cambridge Econometrics (CES info and Idea Consult. Study prepared for the European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry).
  16. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., 2009. Research Methods for Business Students, fifth ed. Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh.
  17. Swain, B., 2017. Recovery and recycling of lithium: a review. Separ. Purif. Technol. 172, 388-403.
  18. Tentori, A.M., Jaworski, J., 2014. Fabrication and applications of biological fibers. Bio Design 2 (3), 69-80.
  19. Yin, R.K., 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, sixth ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizos, V., & Bryhn, J.
Affiliations
Centre for European Policy Studies (BE)
Corresponding author
Rizos, Vasileios
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
338
Pages
130617
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206794630
Cited by
161
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 13
FWCI
25.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
circular economy, circular business models, barriers and facilitators, circular economy policy, supply chain transparency, public procurement, product labels, financial incentives, knowledge sharing platform, business partnerships, R&D subsidies, awareness-raising campaigns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review