The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon-neutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice
Open accessAbstract
Carbon neutrality has become central in policy discourse and cities’ climate actions are crucial to achieve this goal. Consequently, many cities have already published ambitious climate neutrality target years and are preparing for transition to climate neutrality. This study presents findings from the first ever literature review on the carbon-neutral city concept, covering definition, assessment approaches, and barriers and drivers for transition to carbon neutrality. These findings are combined with interviews with Finnish cities aiming at carbon neutrality to explore gaps between research and practice. More clarity is needed on the definition of carbon-neutral city concept and especially on the role of offsetting the emissions (a specific feature compared to other urban climate concepts). The lack of consistency in city carbon accounting methods and emission scopes making cities’ carbon neutrality goals incomparable, thus calling for harmonization and guidance on common assessment methods. In addition to research, climate networks play an important role in the transition to carbon neutrality. Cities have set ambitious goals and need support to develop action plans, assess actions, come up with creative and innovative ideas and increase collaboration with various stakeholders. Development of ways to support cities that have taken on ambitious carbon neutrality targets would benefit from more systematic research on transition to carbon neutrality from different contexts capturing the lessons learned. There is a need for methods that are flexible enough to accommodate adjustments to local conditions and needs, but also consider broader system transition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2 · Cited by 5,177
de Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., & Weijnen, M. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004 · Cited by 1,069
Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Heidrich, O., Church, J. M., Pietrapertosa, F., De Gregorio-Hurtado, S., D'Alonzo, V., Foley, A., Simoes, S. G., Krkoška Lorencová, E., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220 · Cited by 678
Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105661 · Cited by 612
Salvia, M., Reckien, D., Pietrapertosa, F., et al. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110253 · Cited by 460
Towards modern sustainable cities: Review of sustainability principles and trends
Sodiq, A., Baloch, A. A. B., Khan, S. A., Sezer, N., Mahmoud, S., Jama, M., & Abdelaal, A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.106 · Cited by 408
Reiche, D. (2010) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.028 · Cited by 196
Endreny, T., Santagata, R., Perna, A., Stefano, C. D., Rallo, R. F., & Ulgiati, S. (2017) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.016 · Cited by 185
Performance determinants show European cities are delivering on climate mitigation
Hsu, A., Tan, J., Ng, Y. M., Toh, W., Vanda, R., & Goyal, N. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0879-9 · Cited by 168
Cited by
Kovačić, M., Mutavdžija, M., & Buntak, K. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14159525 · Cited by 84
Can artificial intelligence achieve carbon neutrality? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
Chen, S., Zhang, S., Zeng, Q., Ao, J., Chen, X., & Zhang, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2023.1151017 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Huovila, A., Siikavirta, H., Antuña Rozado, C., Rökman, J., Tuominen, P., Paiho, S., Hedman, Å., & Ylén, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 341
- Pages
- 130912
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4213296546
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 24.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon-neutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130912
- The paper
- Huovila, A., Siikavirta, H., Antuña Rozado, C., Rökman, J., Tuominen, P., Paiho, S., Hedman, Å., & Ylén, P. (2022). Carbon-neutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.