CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureTransportation and Mobility Innovationstransportation and logistics systems

New Paradigm of Sustainable Urban Mobility: Electric and Autonomous Vehicles—A Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Open access
Kovačić, Matija, Mutavdžija, Maja, Buntak, Krešimir·2022·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su14159525
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The growing relevance of sustainability, as well as the necessity to replace traditional forms of transportation with sustainable ones, has made sustainable urban mobility an imperative. In order to respond to the ever-increasing need to develop sustainable modes of transport, the importance of electric, autonomous, and electric autonomous vehicles is increasingly emphasized. In addition, as trends of growth and development in electric autonomous vehicle technology are increasing, one of the questions that has appeared is whether autonomous electric vehicles represent one of the mechanisms that will be used to increase the sustainability of urban mobility. With this in mind, the results of a systematic analysis of existing research in the WOS and Scopus databases using the keywords “urban mobility”, “electric vehicles”, and “autonomous vehicles” was carried out to identify research trends in the use of autonomous electric vehicles in urban areas. The research showed that authors focus on the advantages and disadvantages of autonomous electric vehicles and their usage in the urban mobility system, but an insufficient number of authors consider and define the need to plan the transition towards incorporating autonomous electric vehicles into the urban system. The results of this research also indicate an insufficient number of papers that research and describe the application of autonomous electric vehicles in distribution logistics. This paper provides an overview of existing research related to autonomous electric vehicles and the challenges of transition in the context of infrastructure and the development of a culture of sustainability among urban residents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su14159525

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The system of electric AVs can reduce journey time, free up parking in urban areas, and generate cost benefits for customers.

    “The system of electric AVs can reduce journey time, free up parking in urban areas, and generate cost benefits for customers [43][44][45].”

    From Assessing the Role of Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Areas: A Systematic Review of Literature (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Introduction (section 1; page unavailable) says autonomous public transport can lower costs, and the Citation Analysis (section 4.6; page unavailable) reports reduced vehicle-ownership costs from sharing autonomous electric vehicles. The latter discusses using time in the car differently, not shortening journeys. The parking passages in Sustainable Urban Mobility (section 2.1; page unavailable) describe policies to reduce parking spaces, not electric AVs freeing them up. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. Buhaug, H.; Urdal, H. An urbanization bomb? Population growth and social disorder in cities. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23, 1-10. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Cengiz, S.; Görmüş, S.; O guz, D. Analysis of the urban growth pattern through spatial metrics; Ankara City. Land Use Policy 2022, 112, 105812. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Leroutier, M.; Quirion, P. Air pollution and CO 2 from daily mobility: Who emits and Why? Evidence from Paris. Energy Econ. 2022, 109, 105941. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Wei, H.; Wang, X.; Yao, Z.; Liu, H.; Liang, S.; Yang, Y.J. Framework for integrating traffic-source emission estimates into sustainability analysis. CICTP 2012 Multimodal Transp. Syst. Conv. Safe Cost Eff. Effic. 2012, 3612-3619. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Baghestani, A.; Tayarani, M.; Allahviranloo, M.; Gao, H.O. Cordon Pricing, Daily Activity Pattern, and Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution: A Case Study of New York City. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1458. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Caban, J. The investigation of eco-driving possibilities in passenger car used in urban traffic. Transp. Res. Procedia 2021, 55, 212-219. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Cheng, Y.H.; Chang, Y.H.; Lu, I.J. Urban transportation energy and carbon dioxide emission reduction strategies. Appl. Energy 2015, 157, 953-973. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Hofer, C.; Jäger, G.; Füllsack, M. Large scale simulation of CO 2 emissions caused by urban car traffic: An agent-based network approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 183, 1-10. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Zhang, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Zheng, N.; Luo, L.; Xiao, H.; Xiao, H. Fossil fuel-related emissions were the major source of NH3 pollution in urban cities of northern China in the autumn of 2017. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 256, 113428. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Chirinos, L.; Rose, N.L.; Urrutia, R.; Munoz, P.; Torrejón, F.; Torres, L.; Zaror, C. Environmental evidence of fossil fuel pollution in Laguna Chica de San Pedro lake sediments (Central Chile). Environ. Pollut. 2006, 141, 247-256. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Sarwar, S.; Chen, W.; Waheed, R. Electricity consumption, oil price and economic growth: Global perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 9-18. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Giannetti, B.F.; Agostinho, F.; Almeida, C.M.; Liu, G.; Contreras, L.E.; Vandecasteele, C.; Poveda, C. Insights on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals scope: Are they aligned with a 'strong'sustainable development? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119574. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Harlan, S.L.; Ruddell, D.M. Climate change and health in cities: Impacts of heat and air pollution and potential co-benefits from mitigation and adaptation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2011, 3, 126-134. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Mora, L.; Deakin, M.; Reid, A. Strategic principles for smart city development: A multiple case study analysis of European best practices. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 142, 70-97. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Raghuvanshi, A.; Singh, U.K. Internet of Things for smart cities-security issues and challenges. Mater. Today Proc. 2020. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Alavi, A.H.; Jiao, P.; Buttlar, W.G.; Lajnef, N. Internet of Things-enabled smart cities: State-of-the-art and future trends. Measure- ment 2018, 129, 589-606. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Ahad, M.A.; Paiva, S.; Tripathi, G.; Feroz, N. Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102301. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Tsai, C.W.; Lai, C.F.; Vasilakos, A.V. Future internet of things: Open issues and challenges. Wirel. Netw. 2014, 20, 2201-2217. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Quinteros-Condoretty, A.R.; Golroudbary, S.R.; Albareda, L.; Barbiellini, B.; Soyer, A. Impact of circular design of lithium-ion batteries on supply of lithium for electric cars towards a sustainable mobility and energy transition. Procedia CIRP 2021, 100, 73-78. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Meschik, M. Reshaping city traffic towards sustainability why transport policy should favor the bicycle instead of car traffic. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 48, 495-504. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Mozos-Blanco, M.Á.; Pozo-Menéndez, E.; Arce-Ruiz, R.; Baucells-Aletà, N. The way to sustainable mobility. A comparative analysis of sustainable mobility plans in Spain. Transp. Policy 2018, 72, 45-54. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Hamidi, Z.; Zhao, C. Shaping sustainable travel behaviour: Attitude, skills, and access all matter. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 88, 102566. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Pribyl, O.; Blokpoel, R.; Matowicki, M. Addressing EU climate targets: Reducing CO 2 emissions using cooperative and automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 86, 102437. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  24. Huovila, A.; Siikavirta, H.; Rozado, C.A.; Rökman, J.; Tuominen, P.; Paiho, S.; Ylén, P. Carbon-neutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 341, 130912. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Amatuni, L.; Ottelin, J.; Steubing, B.; Mogollón, J.M. Does car sharing reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Assessing the modal shift and lifetime shift rebound effects from a life cycle perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 266, 121869. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Tikoudis, I.; Martinez, L.; Farrow, K.; Bouyssou, C.G.; Petrik, O.; Oueslati, W. Ridesharing services and urban transport CO 2 emissions: Simulation-based evidence from 247 cities. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2021, 97, 102923. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Zappa, W.; Junginger, M.; Van Den Broek, M. Is a 100% renewable European power system feasible by 2050? Appl. Energy 2019, 233, 1027-1050. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Liu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Current and future lithium-ion battery manufacturing. IScience 2021, 24, 102332. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Väyrynen, A.; Salminen, J. Lithium ion battery production. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2012, 46, 80-85. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Martins, L.S.; Guimarães, L.F.; Junior, A.B.B.; Tenório, J.A.S.; Espinosa, D.C.R. Electric car battery: An overview on global demand, recycling and future approaches towards sustainability. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 295, 113091. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  31. Lai, X.; Chen, Q.; Tang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, F.; Guo, Y.; Zheng, Y. Critical review of life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: A lifespan perspective. Etransportation 2022, 12, 100169. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  32. Costa, E.; Wells, P.; Wang, L.; Costa, G. The electric vehicle and renewable energy: Changes in boundary conditions that enhance business model innovations. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 333, 130034. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Bogdanov, D.; Ram, M.; Aghahosseini, A.; Gulagi, A.; Oyewo, A.S.; Child, M.; Breyer, C. Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability. Energy 2021, 227, 120467. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Yang, X.H.; Cheng, Z.; Chen, G.; Wang, L.; Ruan, Z.Y.; Zheng, Y.J. The impact of a public bicycle-sharing system on urban public transport networks. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2018, 107, 246-256. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Podgórniak-Krzykacz, A.; Trippner-Hrabi, J. Motives and factors that determine city residents' use of public bicycles. The case of Lodz, Poland. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2021, 9, 651-662. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Tuominen, A.; Sundqvist-Andberg, H.; Aittasalo, M.; Silonsaari, J.; Kiviluoto, K.; Tapio, P. Building transformative capacity towards active sustainable transport in urban areas-Experiences from local actions in Finland. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2022, 10, 1034-1044. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Maltese, I.; Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E. Active travel in sustainable urban mobility plans. An Italian overview. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2021, 40, 100621. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Arsenio, E.; Martens, K.; Di Ciommo, F. Sustainable urban mobility plans: Bridging climate change and equity targets? Res. Transp. Econ. 2016, 55, 30-39. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Foltýnová, H.B.; Vejchodská, E.; Rybová, K.; Květo ň, V. Sustainable urban mobility: One definition, different stakeholders' opinions. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 87, 102465. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. Lam, D.; Head, P. Sustainable urban mobility. Energy Transp. Environ. 2012, 359-371. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Perra, V.M.; Sdoukopoulos, A.; Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M. Evaluation of sustainable urban mobility in the city of Thessaloniki. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 24, 329-336. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. López, R.A.; Sánchez, T.R.; Aicart, L.M. Attitudes towards the environment related to travel and personal mobility. Transp. Res. Procedia 2021, 58, 201-208. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Kuss, P.; Nicholas, K.A. A dozen effective interventions to reduce car use in European cities: Lessons learned from a meta-analysis and Transition Management. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2022. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Ostermeijer, F.; Koster, H.; Nunes, L.; van Ommeren, J. Citywide parking policy and traffic: Evidence from Amsterdam. J. Urban Econ. 2022, 128, 103418. [CrossRef] · DOI
  45. Herath, H.M.K.K.M.B.; Mittal, M. Adoption of artificial intelligence in smart cities: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights 2020, 2, 100076. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Patier, D.; Routhier, J.L. Urban Logistics in the light of sustainable development: Still a long way to go. Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 46, 93-100. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Tsavachidis, M.; Le Petit, Y. Re-shaping urban mobility-Key to Europe's green transition. J. Urban Mobil. 2022, 2, 100014. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Gevaers, R.; Van de Voorde, E.; Vanelslander, T. Cost modelling and simulation of last-mile characteristics in an innovative B2C supply chain environment with implications on urban areas and cities. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 125, 398-411. [CrossRef] · DOI
  49. Ehrler, V.; Hebes, P. Electromobility for city logistics-The solution to urban transport collapse? An analysis beyond theory. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 48, 786-795. [CrossRef] · DOI
  50. Strale, M. Sustainable urban logistics: What are we talking about? Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2019, 130, 745-751. [CrossRef] · DOI
  51. Ghandi, A.; Paltsev, S. Global CO 2 impacts of light-duty electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 87, 102524. [CrossRef] · DOI
  52. Xu, B.; Sharif, A.; Shahbaz, M.; Dong, K. Have electric vehicles effectively addressed CO 2 emissions? Analysis of eight leading countries using quantile-on-quantile regression approach. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 1205-1214. [CrossRef] · DOI
  53. Van Vliet, O.; Brouwer, A.S.; Kuramochi, T.; van Den Broek, M.; Faaij, A. Energy use, cost and CO 2 emissions of electric cars. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 2298-2310. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  54. Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Yang, W. Optimal design of electric vehicle battery recycling network-From the perspective of electric vehicle manufacturers. Appl. Energy 2020, 275, 115328. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  55. Kucukvar, M.; Onat, N.C.; Kutty, A.A.; Abdella, G.M.; Bulak, M.E.; Ansari, F.; Kumbaroglu, G. Environmental efficiency of electric vehicles in Europe under various electricity production mix scenarios. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 335, 130291. [CrossRef] · DOI
  56. Ondruš, J.; Kolla, E.; Vertal', P.; Šarić, Ž. How do autonomous cars work? Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 44, 226-233. [CrossRef] · DOI
  57. Zhao, G.; Wang, X.; Negnevitsky, M. Connecting battery technologies for electric vehicles from battery materials to management. Iscience 2022, 25, 103744. [CrossRef] · DOI
  58. Xia, X.; Li, P. A review of the life cycle assessment of electric vehicles: Considering the influence of batteries. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 814, 152870. [CrossRef] · DOI
  59. Di, X.; Shi, R. A survey on autonomous vehicle control in the era of mixed-autonomy: From physics-based to AI-guided driving policy learning. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2021, 125, 103008. [CrossRef] · DOI
  60. Hengstler, M.; Enkel, E.; Duelli, S. Applied artificial intelligence and trust-The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2016, 105, 105-120. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  61. Bruck, B.P.; Incerti, V.; Iori, M.; Vignoli, M. Minimizing CO 2 emissions in a practical daily carpooling problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 2017, 81, 40-50. [CrossRef] · DOI
  62. Soni, S.; Reddy, N.; Tsapi, A.; van Arem, B.; Farah, H. Behavioral adaptations of human drivers interacting with automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2022, 86, 48-64. [CrossRef] · DOI
  63. Rezaei, A.; Caulfield, B. Safety of autonomous vehicles: What are the insights from experienced industry professionals? Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2021, 81, 472-489. [CrossRef] · DOI
  64. Pal, A.; Bhattacharya, A.; Chakraborty, A.K. Allocation of electric vehicle charging station considering uncertainties. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2021, 25, 100422. [CrossRef] · DOI
  65. Ghasemi-Marzbali, A. Fast-charging station for electric vehicles, challenges and issues: A comprehensive review. J. Energy Storage 2022, 49, 104136. [CrossRef] · DOI
  66. Gnann, T.; Funke, S.; Jakobsson, N.; Plötz, P.; Sprei, F.; Bennehag, A. Fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles: Today's situation and future needs. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018, 62, 314-329. [CrossRef] · DOI
  67. Simsek, M.; Boukerche, A.; Kantarci, B.; Khan, S. AI-driven autonomous vehicles as COVID-19 assessment centers: A novel crowdsensing-enabled strategy. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2021, 75, 101426. [CrossRef] · DOI
  68. Wang, J.; Huang, H.; Li, K.; Li, J. Towards the unified principles for level 5 autonomous vehicles. Engineering 2021, 7, 1313-1325. [CrossRef] · DOI
  69. Badue, C.; Guidolini, R.; Carneiro, R.V.; Azevedo, P.; Cardoso, V.B.; Forechi, A.; De Souza, A.F. Self-driving cars: A survey. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 165, 113816. [CrossRef] · DOI
  70. Kutela, B.; Das, S.; Dadashova, B. Mining patterns of autonomous vehicle crashes involving vulnerable road users to understand the associated factors. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2022, 165, 106473. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  71. Anastasiadou, K. Sustainable mobility driven prioritization of new vehicle technologies, based on a new decision-aiding methodology. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4760. [CrossRef] · DOI
  72. Kim, K.; Kim, J.S.; Jeong, S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.K. Cybersecurity for autonomous vehicles: Review of attacks and defense. Comput. Secur. 2021, 103, 102150. [CrossRef] · DOI
  73. Gruel, W.; Stanford, J.M. Assessing the long-term effects of autonomous vehicles: A speculative approach. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 13, 18-29. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  74. Costa, C.M.; Barbosa, J.C.; Castro, H.; Gonçalves, R.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Electric vehicles: To what extent are environmentally friendly and cost effective?-Comparative study by european countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 151, 111548. [CrossRef] · DOI
  75. Müller, J.M. Comparing technology acceptance for autonomous vehicles, battery electric vehicles, and car sharing-A study across Europe, China, and North America. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4333. [CrossRef] · DOI
  76. Makarova, I.; Mukhametdinov, E.; Tsybunov, E. Management of the reliability of intelligent vehicles as a method to improve traffic safety. Transp. Res. Procedia 2018, 36, 465-471. [CrossRef] · DOI
  77. Asvadi, A.; Premebida, C.; Peixoto, P.; Nunes, U. 3D Lidar-based static and moving obstacle detection in driving environments: An approach based on voxels and multi-region ground planes. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2016, 83, 299-311. [CrossRef] · DOI
  78. Pendleton, S.D.; Andersen, H.; Du, X.; Shen, X.; Meghjani, M.; Eng, Y.H.; Ang, M.H., Jr. Perception, planning, control, and coordination for autonomous vehicles. Machines 2017, 5, 6. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  79. Mounce, R.; Nelson, J.D. On the potential for one-way electric vehicle car-sharing in future mobility systems. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2019, 120, 17-30. [CrossRef] · DOI
  80. Nikitas, A.; Kougias, I.; Alyavina, E.; Njoya Tchouamou, E. How can autonomous and connected vehicles, electromobility, BRT, hyperloop, shared use mobility and mobility-as-a-service shape transport futures for the context of smart cities? Urban Sci. 2017, 1, 36. [CrossRef] · DOI
  81. Pustišek, M.; Kos, A.; Sedlar, U. Blockchain based autonomous selection of electric vehicle charging station. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things (IIKI), Beijing, China, 10 July 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 217-222. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  82. Philip, B.V.; Alpcan, T.; Jin, J.; Palaniswami, M. Distributed real-time IoT for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 15, 1131-1140. [CrossRef] · DOI
  83. Marletto, G. Who will drive the transition to self-driving? A socio-technical analysis of the future impact of automated vehicles. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 139, 221-234. [CrossRef] · DOI
  84. Acheampong, R.A.; Cugurullo, F.; Gueriau, M.; Dusparic, I. Can autonomous vehicles enable sustainable mobility in future cities? Insights and policy challenges from user preferences over different urban transport options. Cities 2021, 112, 103134. [CrossRef] · DOI
  85. Golbabaei, F.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Bunker, J. The role of shared autonomous vehicle systems in delivering smart urban mobility: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2021, 15, 731-748. [CrossRef] · DOI
  86. Butler, L.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Paz, A. Smart urban mobility innovations: A comprehensive review and evaluation. Ieee Access 2020, 8, 196034-196049. [CrossRef] · DOI
  87. Vosooghi, R.; Puchinger, J.; Bischoff, J.; Jankovic, M.; Vouillon, A. Shared autonomous electric vehicle service performance: Assessing the impact of charging infrastructure. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 81, 102283. [CrossRef] · DOI
  88. Patella, S.M.; Scrucca, F.; Asdrubali, F.; Carrese, S. Carbon Footprint of autonomous vehicles at the urban mobility system level: A traffic simulation-based approach. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 74, 189-200. [CrossRef] · DOI
  89. Nemoto, E.H.; Issaoui, R.; Korbee, D.; Jaroudi, I.; Fournier, G. How to measure the impacts of shared automated electric vehicles on urban mobility. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2021, 93, 102766. [CrossRef] · DOI
  90. Zhao, L.; Malikopoulos, A.A. Enhanced mobility with connectivity and automation: A review of shared autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2020, 14, 87-102. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  91. Miskolczi, M.; Földes, D.; Munkácsy, A.; Jászberényi, M. Urban mobility scenarios until the 2030s. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 72, 103029. [CrossRef] · DOI
  92. Brown, A.; Harris, W.L. Vehicle design and optimization model for urban air mobility. J. Aircr. 2020, 57, 1003-1013. [CrossRef] · DOI
  93. Fagnant, D.J.; Kockelman, K. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2015, 77, 167-181. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  94. Krueger, R.; Rashidi, T.H.; Rose, J.M. Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 69, 343-355. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  95. Chen, T.D.; Kockelman, K.M.; Hanna, J.P. Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2016, 94, 243-254. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  96. Milakis, D.; Van Arem, B.; Van Wee, B. Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2017, 21, 324-348. [CrossRef] 100. Litman, T. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning. Vic. Transp. Policy Institute. 2020. Available online: https://www.vtpi.org/avip.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2022). 101. · DOI · Paper page
  97. Fagnant, D.J.; Kockelman, K.M. The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2020, 40, 1-13. [CrossRef] 102. Martinez, L.M.; Viegas, J.M. Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, 13-27. [CrossRef] 103. · DOI · Paper page
  98. Loeb, B.; Kockelman, K.M.; Liu, J. Shared autonomous electric vehicle (SAEV) operations across the Austin, Texas network with charging infrastructure decisions. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2018, 89, 222-233. [CrossRef] 104. Gurumurthy, K.M.; Kockelman, K.M. Analyzing the dynamic ride-sharing potential for shared autonomous vehicle fleets using cellphone data from Orlando, Florida. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2018, 71, 177-185. [CrossRef] 105. Chen, B.; Sun, D.; Zhou, J.; Wong, W.; Ding, Z. A future intelligent traffic system with mixed autonomous vehicles and human-driven vehicles. Inf. Sci. 2020, 529, 59-72. [CrossRef] 106. Guo, Y.; Chen, X.; Yang, Y. Multimodal transport distribution model for autonomous driving vehicles based on improved ALNS. Alex. Eng. J. 2022, 61, 2939-2958. [CrossRef] 107. · DOI
  99. Völz, V.; Mattfeld, D.C.; Scherr, Y.O. Relocation planning with partly autonomous vehicles in car sharing systems. Transp. Res. Procedia 2022, 62, 213-220. [CrossRef] 108. Martínez-Díaz, M.; Soriguera, F. Autonomous vehicles: Theoretical and practical challenges. Transp. Res. Procedia 2018, 33, 275-282. [CrossRef] 109. Chen, Y.; Shiwakoti, N.; Stasinopoulos, P.; Khan, S.K. State-of-the-art of factors affecting the adoption of automated vehicles. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6697. [CrossRef] 110. Le Pira, M.; Ignaccolo, M.; Inturri, G.; Pluchino, A.; Rapisarda, A. Modelling stakeholder participation in transport planning. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2016, 4, 230-238. [CrossRef] 111. Lindenau, M.; Böhler-Baedeker, S. Citizen and stakeholder involvement: A precondition for sustainable urban mobility. Transp. Res. Procedia 2014, 4, 347-360. [CrossRef] 112. Lozano, D.L.A.; Márquez, S.E.D.; Puentes, M.E.M. Sustainable and smart mobility evaluation since citizen participation in responsive cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 2021, 58, 519-526. [CrossRef] 113. Lindkvist, H.; Melander, L. How sustainable are urban transport services? A comparison of MaaS and UCC. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2022, 43, 100829. [CrossRef] 114. Jiang, X.; Zhao, L.; Cheng, Y.; Wei, S.; Jin, Y. Optimal configuration of electric vehicles for charging stations under the fast power supplement mode. J. Energy Storage 2022, 45, 103677. [CrossRef] 115. Dulău, L.I.; Bică, D. Effects of electric vehicles on power networks. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 46, 370-377. [CrossRef] 116. Ferreira, M.; Damas, L.; Conceicao, H.; · DOI
  100. Köse, M.Ç.; Steingrímsson, J.G.; Schmid, J.; van Veldhuizen, R.; Kübler, D.; Seliger, G. Sustainable urban mobility through the perspective of overcompliance. Procedia CIRP 2016, 40, 312-317. [CrossRef] 141. Decker, B.; Hećimović, H.; Wołek, M. Sustainable urban mobility planning in central eastern Europe: Case examples from Poland and Croatia. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 48, 2748-2757. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kovačić, M., Mutavdžija, M., & Buntak, K.
Affiliations
  • University North (HR)
  • Department of Sustainable Mobility and Logistics, University North, Trg dr. Žarka Dolinara 1, 48000 Koprivnica, Croatia
Corresponding author
Kovačić, Matija
ORCID
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-03
Volume
14
Issue
15
Pages
9525
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/su14159525
OpenAlex
W4289731386
Cited by
84
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University North, Republic of Croatia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › transportation and logistics systems
Keywords
sustainable urban mobility, autonomous electric vehicles, electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, research trends, transition planning, distribution logistics, infrastructure, sustainability culture, bibliometric analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review