The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sometimes linear, sometimes circular: States of the economy and transitions to the future
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Convenience of transition toward CE is not to be taken for granted: in particular, it is not economically convenient when 'the cost of inputs is low, social costs are not internalised in products, or there is no need to minimise waste, close material cycles, or reuse products or their parts ' (Morseletto, 2023, p. 390).”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Morseletto, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094
Interrogating the circular economy: The moral economy of resource recovery in the EU
Gregson, N., Crang, M., Fuller, S., & Holmes, H. (2015) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2015.1013353 · Cited by 743
Circular Business Models: Defining a Concept and Framing an Emerging Research Field
Nußholz, J. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101810 · Cited by 415
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- Ali, 2018, Integrating biodiversity offsets within Circular Economy policy in China, J. Clean. Prod., 185, 32, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.027 · DOI
- Acquier, 2019, How to create value (s) in the sharing economy: business models, scalability, and sustainability, Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev., 9, 10.22215/timreview/1215 · DOI
- Bairoch, 1982, International industrialisation levels from 1750 to 1980, J. Eur. Econ. Hist., 11, 269
- Bakker, 2021, Understanding and managing product lifetimes in support of a circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 279, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123764 · DOI
- Barles, 2014, History of waste management and the social and cultural representations of waste, 199, 10.1007/978-3-319-09180-8_7 · DOI
- Berry, 2022, Is convergence around the circular economy necessary? Exploring the productivity of divergence in US circular economy discourse and practice, Circ. Econom. Sustain., 1
- Berg, 2004, In pursuit of luxury: global history and British consumer goods in the eighteenth century, Past Present, 182, 85, 10.1093/past/182.1.85 · DOI
- Bevan, 2014, Mediterranean containerization, Curr. Anthropol., 55, 10.1086/677034 · DOI
- Bianchi, 2022, Does circular economy mitigate the extraction of natural resources? Empirical evidence based on analysis of 28 European economies over the past decade, Ecol. Econ., 203
- Blomsma, 2019, Developing a circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies to support circular economy-oriented innovation, J. Clean. Prod., 241, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118271 · DOI
- Bocken, 2016, Towards a sufficiency-driven business model: experiences and opportunities, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 18, 41, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.010 · DOI
- Bridge, 2009, Material worlds: natural resources, resource geography and the material economy, Geogr. Compass, 3, 1217, 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00233.x · DOI
- Brouillat, 2015, Live fast, die young? Investigating product life spans and obsolescence in an agent-based model, J. Evol. Econ., 25, 447, 10.1007/s00191-014-0385-1 · DOI
- Cantzler, 2020, Saving resources and the climate? A systematic review of the circular economy and its mitigation potential, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 10.1088/1748-9326/abbeb7 · DOI
- Centobelli, 2021, Determinants of the transition towards circular economy in SMEs: a sustainable supply chain management perspective, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 242, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108297 · DOI
- Daly, 1974, The economics of the steady state, Am. Econ. Rev., 64, 15
- Fogliatto, 2012, The mass customization decade: an updated review of the literature, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 138, 14, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.002 · DOI
- Haas, 2020, Spaceship earth's odyssey to a circular economy-a century long perspective, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 163, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105076 · DOI
- Henrysson, 2021, The role of institutions in creating circular economy pathways for regional development, J. Environ. Dev., 30, 149, 10.1177/1070496521991876 · DOI
- Hicks, 2018, Environmental Implications of consumer convenience: coffee as a case study, J. Ind. Ecol., 22, 79, 10.1111/jiec.12487 · DOI
- Jackson, 2005, Live better by consuming less?: is there a “double dividend” in sustainable consumption?, J. Ind. Ecol., 9, 19, 10.1162/1088198054084734 · DOI
- Jungell-Michelsson, 2022, Sufficiency: a systematic literature review, Ecol. Econ., 195, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107380 · DOI
- Kathan, 2016, The sharing economy: your business model's friend or foe?, Bus. Horiz., 59, 663, 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.06.006 · DOI
- Kjaer, 2019, Product/service‐systems for a circular economy: the route to decoupling economic growth from resource consumption?, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 22, 10.1111/jiec.12747 · DOI · Paper page
- Lahti, 2018, A definition and theoretical review of the circular economy, value creation, and sustainable business models: where are we now and where should research move in the future?, Sustainability, 10, 2799, 10.3390/su10082799 · DOI
- Lemire, 2008, East & West: textiles and fashion in early modern Europe, J. Soc. Hist., 887, 10.1353/jsh.0.0019 · DOI
- Lorek, 2013, Strong sustainable consumption governance–precondition for a degrowth path?, J. Clean. Prod., 38, 36, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.008 · DOI
- Lounsbury, 2005, Institutional variation in the evolution of social movements, Soc. Movem. Organ. Theor., 73
- Lüdeke‐Freund, 2019, A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 36, 10.1111/jiec.12763 · DOI · Paper page
- Merli, 2018, How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review, J. Clean. Prod., 178, 703, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · DOI
- Mies, 2021, Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 321, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128960 · DOI
- Mishra, 2018, Value creation from circular economy-led closed loop supply chains: a case study of fast-moving consumer goods, Prod. Plann. Control, 29, 509, 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449245 · DOI
- Morseletto, 2020, Targets for a circular economy, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 153, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553 · DOI
- Morseletto, 2020, Restorative and regenerative: exploring the concepts in the circular economy, J. Ind. Ecol., 24, 763, 10.1111/jiec.12987 · DOI
- Morseletto, 2020, A new framework for policy evaluation: targets, marine litter, Italy and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Mar. Pol., 117, 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103956 · DOI
- Morseletto, 2022, Environmental principles for modern sustainable economic frameworks including the circular economy, Sustain. Sci., 1
- Mugge, 2010, Product attachment and satisfaction: understanding consumers' post-purchase behavior, J. Consum. Market., 27, 271, 10.1108/07363761011038347 · DOI
- Nesterova, 2020, Degrowth business framework: implications for sustainable development, J. Clean. Prod., 262, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121382 · DOI
- Niero, 2021, Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives?, J. Ind. Ecol., 25, 1111, 10.1111/jiec.13134 · DOI
- Ortega Alvarado, 2022, Contesting consumerism with a circular economy?, Circ. Econom. Sustain., 1
- Ottelin, 2020, Rebound effects may jeopardize the resource savings of circular consumption: evidence from household material footprints, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 10.1088/1748-9326/abaa78 · DOI
- Pearce, 1987, Marginal opportunity cost as a planning concept in natural resource management, Ann. Reg. Sci., 21, 18, 10.1007/BF01287280 · DOI
- Priyadarshini, 2020, Fostering sustainable land restoration through circular economy‐governed transitions, Restor. Ecol., 28, 719, 10.1111/rec.13181 · DOI
- Røpke, 1999, The dynamics of willingness to consume, Ecol. Econ., 28, 399, 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00107-4 · DOI
- Rundh, 2013, Linking packaging to marketing: how packaging is influencing the marketing strategy, Br. Food J., 115, 1547, 10.1108/BFJ-12-2011-0297 · DOI
- Sarkis, 2022, Coordinating circular & degrowth systems for strong sustainability, Cut. IT J., 35, 28
- Schöggl, 2020, The narrative of sustainability and circular economy-A longitudinal review of two decades of research, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 163, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105073 · DOI
- Schröder, 2019, The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 77, 10.1111/jiec.12732 · DOI
- Schröder, 2020, Making the circular economy work for human development, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 156, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104686 · DOI
- Selvefors, 2019, Use to use–A user perspective on product circularity, J. Clean. Prod., 223, 1014, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.117 · DOI
- Schor, 2021, The sharing economy: rhetoric and reality, Annu. Rev. Sociol., 47, 369, 10.1146/annurev-soc-082620-031411 · DOI
- Sehnem, 2019, Circular economy: benefits, impacts and overlapping, Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J., 24, 784, 10.1108/SCM-06-2018-0213 · DOI
- Tura, 2019, Unlocking circular business: a framework of barriers and drivers, J. Clean. Prod., 212, 90, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202 · DOI
- Twede, 2002, Commercial amphoras: the earliest consumer packages?, J. Macromarketing, 22, 98, 10.1177/027467022001009 · DOI
- Vivanco, 2016, How to deal with the rebound effect? A policy-oriented approach, Energy Pol., 94, 114, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.054 · DOI
- Witt, 2001, Learning to consume–A theory of wants and the growth of demand, J. Evol. Econ., 11, 23, 10.1007/PL00003851 · DOI
- Woldeyes, 2022, Emerging business models for circular economy: a systematic literature review, vol. 17, 599
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multi-stakeholder perspectives on sustainability transitions in the cosmetic industry
Suphasomboon, T., & Vassanadumrongdee, S. (2023) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.04.008 · Cited by 35
Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies
Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143584 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Morseletto, P.
- ORCID
- Morseletto, Piero
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 390
- Pages
- 136138
- ISSN
- 0959-6526
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review



