Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Objective To describe the process of development, content, and methods of implementation of reporting guidelines for health research. Study design and setting A systematic review of publications describing health research reporting guidelines developed using consensus. Results Eighty-one reporting guidelines for health research were included in the review. The largest number of guidelines do not focus on a specific study type (n=35; 43%), whereas those that do primarily refer to reporting of randomized controlled trials (n=16; 35%). Most of the guidelines (n=76; 94%) include a checklist of recommended reporting items, with a median of 21 checklist items (range: 5-64 items). Forty-seven (58%) reporting guidelines were classified as new guidance. Explanation documents were developed for 11 (14%) reporting guidelines. Reporting-guideline developers provided little information about the guideline development process. Developers of 50 (62%) reporting guidelines encouraged endorsement, most commonly by including guidelines in journal instructions to authors (n=18; 36%). Conclusions Reporting-guideline developers need to endeavor to maximize the quality of their product. Recently developed guidance is likely to facilitate more robust guideline development. Journal editors can be more confident in endorsing reporting guidelines that have followed these approaches.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence-based tools developed by experts could help streamline particular procedures that authors could follow to create reproducible and higher quality studies.
“Evidence-based tools developed by experts could help streamline particular procedures that authors could follow to create reproducible and higher quality studies. 18 -20”
From A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 · Cited by 23,020 · see citing works
Self-citationMoher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373 · see citing works
Self-citationMoher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826 · see citing works
Self-citationConsort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
Campbell, M. K., Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., & for the CONSORT Group (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e5661 · Cited by 3,510 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41 · Cited by 3,215
Self-citationImproving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Begg, C. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030 · Cited by 3,127 · see citing works
Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & the TREND Group (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.361 · Cited by 2,817 · see citing works
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement
Zwarenstein, M., Treweek, S., Gagnier, J. J., Altman, D. G., Tunis, S., Haynes, B., Oxman, A. D., Moher, D., & groups, F. T. C. A. P. T. I. H. (. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a2390 · Cited by 1,813 · see citing works
Self-citationMoher, D., Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & for the CONSORT Group* (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00011 · Cited by 1,426 · see citing works
Self-citationReporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement
Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., Pocock, S. J., Evans, S. J. W., & CONSORT Group, F. T. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.10.1152 · Cited by 1,153 · see citing works
Self-citationPlint, A. C., Moher, D., Morrison, A., Schulz, K., Altman, D. G., Hill, C., & Gaboury, I. (2006) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x · Cited by 872 · see citing works
Self-citationHow Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis
Shojania, K. G., Sampson, M., Ansari, M. T., Ji, J., Doucette, S., & Moher, D. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-4-200708210-00179 · Cited by 838 · see citing works
Self-citationLittle, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Moher, D., Gagnon, F., von Elm, E., Khoury, M. J., Cohen, B., Davey-Smith, G., Grimshaw, J., et al. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000022 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Self-citationReporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be?
APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.9.839 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., & for the CONSORT Group* (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008-w1 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Self-citationHow to formulate research recommendations
Brown, P., Brunnhuber, K., Chalkidou, K., Chalmers, I., Clarke, M., Fenton, M., Forbes, C., Glanville, J., Hicks, N. J., Moody, J., et al. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38987.492014.94 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors
Simera, I., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Hoey, J. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050139 · Cited by 220 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Similar results have been reported elsewhere [97].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPrady, S. L., Richmond, S. J., Morton, V. M., & MacPherson, H. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001577 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews
Sampson, M., McGowan, J., Tetzlaff, J., Cogo, E., & Moher, D. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.009 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationDistribution of Study Designs in Four Major US Journals of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Funai, E. F., Rosenbush, E. J., Lee, M.-J., & Del Priore, G. (2001) · Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · doi:10.1159/000052882 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Caldwell, D. M., Chaimani, A., Schmid, C. H., Cameron, C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Straus, S., Thorlund, K., Jansen, J. P., et al. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2385 · Cited by 8,269 · see citing works
Self-citationA scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J. P., Wilson, K., et al. (2016) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4 · Cited by 2,250 · see citing works
A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS)
Sharma, A., Minh Duc, N. T., Luu Lam Thang, T., Nam, N. H., Ng, S. J., Abbas, K. S., Huy, N. T., Marušić, A., Paul, C. L., Kwok, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1 · Cited by 2,292 · see citing works
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 · Cited by 1,998 · see citing works
Self-citationConsolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., Loder, E., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f1049 · Cited by 1,776 · see citing works
Self-citationIncreasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Greenland, S., Hlatky, M. A., Khoury, M. J., Macleod, M. R., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Tibshirani, R. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62227-8 · Cited by 1,597 · see citing works
Self-citationA call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
Landis, S. C., Amara, S. G., Asadullah, K., Austin, C. P., Blumenstein, R., Bradley, E. W., Crystal, R. G., Darnell, R. B., Ferrante, R. J., Fillit, H., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11556 · Cited by 1,196 · see citing works
Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and elaboration statement
Slade, S. C., Dionne, C. E., Underwood, M., & Buchbinder, R. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096651 · Cited by 961 · see citing works
Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.010 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Self-citationConsolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462313000160 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Self-citationConsolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., Loder, E., et al. (2013) · Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation · doi:10.1186/1478-7547-11-6 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Self-citationMöhler, R., Köpke, S., & Meyer, G. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0709-y · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Lund, S., Richardson, A., & May, C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116629 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Omega-3 fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease
Abdelhamid, A. S., Brown, T. J., Brainard, J. S., Biswas, P., Thorpe, G. C., Moore, H. J., Deane, K. H., Summerbell, C. D., Worthington, H. V., Song, F., et al. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003177.pub5 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Stevens, A., Shamseer, L., Weinstein, E., Yazdi, F., Turner, L., Thielman, J., Altman, D. G., Hirst, A., Hoey, J., Palepu, A., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g3804 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement
Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Shadish, W., Vohra, S., Barlow, D. H., Horner, R., Kazdin, A., Kratochwill, T., McDonald, S., et al. (2016) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.2016.96.7.e1 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Self-citationGrant, S. P., Mayo-Wilson, E., Melendez-Torres, G. J., & Montgomery, P. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065442 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Moher, D. (2018) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1226-0 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationFuller, T., Pearson, M., Peters, J., & Anderson, R. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121585 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Cashin, A. G., Lee, H., Lamb, S. E., Hopewell, S., Mansell, G., Williams, C. M., Kamper, S. J., Henschke, N., & McAuley, J. H. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.005 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Knüppel, H., Metz, C., Meerpohl, J. J., & Strech, D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075995 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Fuller, T., Peters, J., Pearson, M., & Anderson, R. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302195 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Möhler, R., Bartoszek, G., & Meyer, G. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-125 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Koçak, B., Keleş, A., & Köse, F. (2024) · Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.4274/dir.2024.232604 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moher, D., Weeks, L., Ocampo, M., Seely, D., Sampson, M., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Miller, D., Simera, I., Grimshaw, J., & Hoey, J.
- Affiliations
- Ottawa Hospital (CA)
- Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine (CA)
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CA)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Family Health International 360 (US)
- Queen's University (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 718-742
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102381912
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK
- Medical Research Council (MC_qA137931)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- reporting guidelines, health research, consensus development, reporting checklist, randomized controlled trials, guideline endorsement, guideline development, research transparency
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Publishing, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Research Design, Guidelines as Topic, Peer Review, Research, Consensus, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review