Cited by 189Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Policy Implementation SciencePsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement

Open access
Tate, Robyn L., Perdices, Michael, Rosenkoetter, Ulrike, Shadish, William, Vohra, Sunita, Barlow, David H., Horner, Robert, Kazdin, Alan +18 more·2016·Physical Therapy

Abstract

We developed a reporting guideline to provide authors with guidance about what should be reported when writing a paper for publication in a scientific journal using a particular type of research design: the single-case experimental design. This report describes the methods used to develop the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016. As a result of 2 online surveys and a 2-day meeting of experts, the SCRIBE 2016 checklist was developed, which is a set of 26 items that authors need to address when writing about single-case research. This article complements the more detailed SCRIBE 2016 Explanation and Elaboration article (Tate et al., 2016) that provides a rationale for each of the items and examples of adequate reporting from the literature. Both these resources will assist authors to prepare reports of single-case research with clarity, completeness, accuracy, and transparency. They will also provide journal reviewers and editors with a practical checklist against which such reports may be critically evaluated. We recommend that the SCRIBE 2016 is used by authors preparing manuscripts describing single-case research for publication, as well as journal reviewers and editors who are evaluating such manuscripts. Scientific Abstract: Reporting guidelines, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement, improve the reporting of research in the medical literature (Turner et al., 2012). Many such guidelines exist and the CONSORT Extension to Nonpharmacological Trials (Boutron et al., 2008) provides suitable guidance for reporting between-groups intervention studies in the behavioral sciences. The CONSORT Extension for N-of-1 Trials (CENT 2015) was developed for multiple crossover trials with single individuals in the medical sciences (Shamseer et al., 2015; Vohra et al., 2015), but there is no reporting guideline in the CONSORT tradition for single-case research used in the behavioral sciences. We developed the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 to meet this need. This Statement article describes the methodology of the development of the SCRIBE 2016, along with the outcome of 2 Delphi surveys and a consensus meeting of experts. We present the resulting 26-item SCRIBE 2016 checklist. The article complements the more detailed SCRIBE 2016 Explanation and Elaboration article (Tate et al., 2016) that provides a rationale for each of the items and examples of adequate reporting from the literature. Both these resources will assist authors to prepare reports of single-case research with clarity, completeness, accuracy, and transparency. They will also provide journal reviewers and editors with a practical checklist against which such reports may be critically evaluated. Keywords: single-case design, methodology, reporting guidelines, publication standards Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/arc0000026.supp

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2522/ptj.2016.96.7.e1

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Shadish, W., Vohra, S., Barlow, D. H., Horner, R., Kazdin, A., Kratochwill, T., McDonald, S., Sampson, M., Shamseer, L., Togher, L., Albin, R., Backman, C., Douglas, J., Evans, J. J., Gast, D., Manolov, R., Mitchell, G., Nickels, L., Nikles, J., Ownsworth, T., Rose, M., Schmid, C. H., & Wilson, B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of California, Merced (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Brown University (US)
  • B. Wilson, Department of Neuropsychology, Oliver Zangwill Centre, Ely, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Corresponding author
Tate, Robyn L.
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
96
Issue
7
Pages
e1-e10
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W2473881394
Cited by
189
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Physical Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
single-case experimental design, reporting guidelines, behavioral interventions, research transparency, reporting checklist, CONSORT, N-of-1 trials, expert consensus, Delphi method, reporting quality, journal peer review
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Delphi Technique, Humans, Research Design, Guidelines as Topic, Peer Review, Research, Checklist, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review