Cited by 40Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Sciences Research and EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Search filters can find some but not all knowledge translation articles in MEDLINE: an analytic survey

McKibbon, K. Ann, Lokker, Cynthia, Wilczynski, Nancy L., Haynes, R. Brian, Ciliska, Donna, Dobbins, Maureen, Davis, David A., Straus, Sharon E.·2012·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective Advances from health research are not well applied giving rise to over- and underuse of resources and inferior care. Knowledge translation (KT), actions and processes of getting research findings used in practice, can improve research application. The KT literature is difficult to find because of nonstandardized terminology, rapid evolution of the field, and it is spread across several domains. We created multiple search filters to retrieve KT articles from MEDLINE.Study design and setting Analytic survey using articles from 12 journals tagged as having KT content and also as describing a KT application or containing a KT theory.Results Of 2,594 articles, 579 were KT articles of which 201 were about KT applications and 152 about KT theory. Search filter sensitivity (retrieval efficiency) maximized at 83%-94% with specificity (no retrieval of irrelevant material) approximately 50%. Filter performances were enhanced with multiple terms, but these filters often had reduced specificity. Performance was higher for KT applications and KT theory articles. These filters can select KT material although many irrelevant articles also will be retrieved.Conclusion KT search filters were developed and tested, with good sensitivity but suboptimal specificity. Further research must improve their performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.014

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKibbon, K. A., Lokker, C., Wilczynski, N. L., Haynes, R. B., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M., Davis, D. A., & Straus, S. E.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Association of American Medical Colleges (US)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
McKibbon, K. Ann
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
651-659
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047221535
Cited by
37
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
knowledge translation, search filters, MEDLINE, literature searching, search sensitivity and specificity, search terms, bibliographic database searching
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Research Design, Review Literature as Topic, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, MEDLINE, Information Storage and Retrieval, Evidence-Based Medicine, Knowledge, Information Dissemination, Medical Subject Headings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review