The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Open accessAbstract
Objectives Citation bias concerns the selective citation of scientific articles based on their results. We brought together all available evidence on citation bias across scientific disciplines and quantified its impact.Study design and setting An extensive search strategy was applied to the Web of Science Core Collection and Medline, yielding 52 studies in total. We classified these studies on scientific discipline, selection method, and other variables. We also performed random-effects meta-analyses to pool the effect of positive vs. negative results on subsequent citations. Finally, we checked for other determinants of citation as reported in the citation bias literature.Results Evidence for the occurrence of citation bias was most prominent in the biomedical sciences and least in the natural sciences. Articles with statistically significant results were cited 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-1.8) times more often than articles with nonsignificant results. Articles in which the authors explicitly conclude to have found support for their hypothesis were cited 2.7 (CI 2.0-3.7) times as often. Article results and journal impact factor were associated with citation more often than any other reported determinant.Conclusion Similar to what we already know on publication bias, also citation bias can lead to an overrepresentation of positive results and unfounded beliefs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the tendency of journals to favor AI studies with positive results—especially those that demonstrate superior performance—skews the published literature, giving an incomplete view of the AI landscape [109].”
From Bias in medical AI: Implications for clinical decision-making (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“and cited more frequently by others (citation bias) 19”
From Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: a review (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fanelli, D. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738 · Cited by 1,911 · cited 1×
“According to a meta-analysis of surveys [3], researchers report to engage in QRPs (about 34%) much more often than in research misconduct (about 2%).”
BackgroundThe Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses
IOANNIDIS, J. P. A. (2016) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12210 · Cited by 1,483
Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.2.218 · Cited by 1,465
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Song, F., Parekh, Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Ryder, J., Sutton, A., Hing, C., Kwok, C., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14080 · Cited by 1,039
Callaham, M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847 · Cited by 644
How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network
Greenberg, S. A. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2680 · Cited by 499
Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions
Steneck, N. H. (2006) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/pl00022268 · Cited by 407
What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?
Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.010 · Cited by 368
Cholesterol lowering trials in coronary heart disease: Frequency of citation and outcome.
Ravnskov, U. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6844.15 · Cited by 313
Aguinis, H., Dalton, D. R., Bosco, F. A., Pierce, C. A., & Dalton, C. M. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310377113 · Cited by 302
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Peritz, 1992, The use of meta-analyses for citation studies: an illustrative example, Informetrics, 91, 358
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bias in medical AI: Implications for clinical decision-making
Cross, J. L., Choma, M. A., & Onofrey, J. A. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000651 · Cited by 607
Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results
Mlinarić, A., Horvat, M., & Smolčić, V. Š. (2017) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2017.030201 · Cited by 546
Misinformation in and about science
West, J. D., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1912444117 · Cited by 391
Page, M. J., Sterne, J. A. C., Higgins, J. P. T., & Egger, M. (2021) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1468 · Cited by 294
Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis
Nakagawa, S., Samarasinghe, G., Haddaway, N., Westgate, M. J., O’Dea, R. E., Noble, D. W. A., & Lagisz, M. (2018) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.007 · Cited by 278
Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies
Boutron, I., Page, M. J., Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Lundh, A., Hróbjartsson, A., & on behalf of the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (2019) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9781119536604.ch7 · Cited by 258
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?
Robinson, K. A., Brunnhuber, K., Ciliska, D., Juhl, C. B., Christensen, R., & Lund, H. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.020 · Cited by 146
Bishop, D. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819886519 · Cited by 115
Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
Van Calster, B., Wynants, L., Riley, R. D., van Smeden, M., & Collins, G. S. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.018 · Cited by 105
de Vries, Y. A., Roest, A. M., de Jonge, P., Cuijpers, P. J., Munafo, M. R., & Bastiaansen, J. A. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718001873 · Cited by 108
Researcher and Author Impact Metrics: Variety, Value, and Context
Gasparyan, A. Y., Yessirkepov, M., Duisenova, A., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2018) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e139 · Cited by 103
Urlings, M. J. E., Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M. H., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.019 · Cited by 108
Self-citationEEG datasets for seizure detection and prediction— A review
Wong, S., Simmons, A., Rivera‐Villicana, J., Barnett, S., Sivathamboo, S., Perucca, P., Ge, Z., Kwan, P., Kuhlmann, L., Vasa, R., et al. (2023) · Epilepsia Open · doi:10.1002/epi4.12704 · Cited by 95
Embracing higher education leadership in sustainability: A systematic review
Sanchez-Carrillo, J. C., Cadarso, M., & Gómez, M. Á. T. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126675 · Cited by 92
Magliano, D. J., Chen, L., Carstensen, B., Gregg, E. W., Pavkov, M. E., Salim, A., Andes, L. J., Balicer, R., Baviera, M., Chan, J. C. N., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00327-2 · Cited by 91
The Dark Side of Radiomics: On the Paramount Importance of Publishing Negative Results
Buvat, I., & Orlhac, F. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.119.235325 · Cited by 83
Reeves, R., Curran, D., Gleeson, A., & Hanna, D. (2022) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445521991102 · Cited by 69
“frequently published in scientific literature (Duyx et al., 2017).”
Scientific Hypotheses: Writing, Promoting, and Predicting Implications
Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., Mukanova, U., Yessirkepov, M., & Kitas, G. D. (2019) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e300 · Cited by 64
van den Akker, O. R., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Bakker, M., Elsherif, M. M., Wong, T. K., & Wicherts, J. M. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02277-0 · Cited by 86
Top-cited articles in medical professionalism: a bibliometric analysis versus altmetric scores
Azer, S. A., & Azer, S. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029433 · Cited by 58
Citation bias, diversity, and ethics
Ray, K. S., Zurn, P., Dworkin, J. D., Bassett, D. S., & Resnik, D. B. (2022) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257 · Cited by 60
Discontinuing Long-Term PPI Therapy: Why, With Whom, and How?
Targownik, L. E. (2018) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2018.29 · Cited by 56
Interneuron Dysfunction and Inhibitory Deficits in Autism and Fragile X Syndrome
Nomura, T. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10102610 · Cited by 51
Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and diagnostic meta‐analysis
Koopaie, M., Kolahdooz, S., Fatahzadeh, M., & Manifar, S. (2022) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.4640 · Cited by 55
Scott, M., Shaver, N., Lapenskie, J., Isenberg, S. R., Saunders, S., Hsu, A. T., & Tanuseputro, P. (2019) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216319870649 · Cited by 48
Yuan, Z.-Z., Fan, Y.-Z., Cheng, S.-J., Wei, F.-J., Gao, J., Wang, C., Song, B.-S., Tan, S.-L., Gao, S.-L., Kang, J.-J., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03090-x · Cited by 50
Research fraud: a long-term problem exacerbated by the clamour for research grants
Harvey, L. (2020) · Quality in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13538322.2020.1820126 · Cited by 48
Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis
Nuijten, M. B., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Augusteijn, H. E. M., Crompvoets, E. A. V., & Wicherts, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence8040036 · Cited by 42
Kirkpatrick, R. H., Munoz, D. P., Khalid-Khan, S., & Booij, L. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.023 · Cited by 41
Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M. H., Urlings, M. J. E., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-019-1082-9 · Cited by 40
Self-citationPhaf, R. H. (2020) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354319898250 · Cited by 41
The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation
da Silva, J. A. T., & Vuong, Q. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03960-9 · Cited by 41
Citation bias: questionable research practice or scientific misconduct?
Gøtzsche, P. C. (2022) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/01410768221075881 · Cited by 37
Promoting learning from null or negative results in prevention science trials
Axford, N., Berry, V., Lloyd, J., Hobbs, T., & Wyatt, K. (2022) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-020-01140-4 · Cited by 34
Doleman, B., Mathiesen, O., Jakobsen, J. C., Sutton, A. J., Freeman, S. C., Lund, J. N., & Williams, J. P. (2021) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.004 · Cited by 36
Vitamin D in early life and later risk of multiple sclerosis—A systematic review, meta-analysis
Ismailova, K., Poudel, P., Parlesak, A., Frederiksen, P., & Heitmann, B. L. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221645 · Cited by 31
Schneider, J. W., Allum, N., Andersen, J. P., Petersen, M. B., Madsen, E. B., Mejlgaard, N., & Zachariae, R. H. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304342 · Cited by 34
Frank, R. A., Sharifabadi, A. D., Salameh, J., McGrath, T. A., Kraaijpoel, N., Dang, W., Li, N., Gauthier, I. D., Wu, M. Z., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2018) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5801-8 · Cited by 30
Khan, M. S., Shahid, I., Asad, N., Greene, S. J., Khan, S. U., Doukky, R., Metra, M., Anker, S. D., Filippatos, G. S., Fonarow, G. C., et al. (2020) · ESC Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ehf2.13099 · Cited by 28
Fernández, N., Niño, A. P., Azuero, A. J., O’Kelly, F., Hannick, J. H., Rickard, M., Kirsch, A. J., Caldamone, A. A., & Koyle, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Pediatric Urology · doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.004 · Cited by 26
Biases in scholarly recommender systems: impact, prevalence, and mitigation
Färber, M., Coutinho, M., & Yuan, S. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04636-2 · Cited by 31
Yilmaz, T., Jutten, R. J., Santos, C. Y., Hernandez, K. A., & Snyder, P. J. (2018) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2018.03.005 · Cited by 24
Page, L., NOUSSAIR, C. N., & Slonim, R. L. (2021) · Journal of the Economic Science Association · doi:10.1007/s40881-021-00107-7 · Cited by 23
Bass, S. B., Brajuha, J. A., Kelly, P. J. A., D’Avanzo, P. A., Lambertini, E., Nordhagen, S., & Monterrosa, E. C. (2022) · Foodborne Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1089/fpd.2021.0056 · Cited by 25
How to Handle Co-authorship When Not Everyone’s Research Contributions Make It into the Paper
Helgesson, G., Master, Z., & Bülow, W. (2021) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00303-y · Cited by 23
Leng, G., & Leng, R. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12228.001.0001 · Cited by 25
Hughes, Z. D., Ball, L. J., Richardson, C., & Judge, J. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02327-w · Cited by 22
Salivary noncoding RNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Koopaie, M., Kolahdooz, S., Fatahzadeh, M., & Aleedawi, Z. A. (2022) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/eci.13848 · Cited by 19
The 50 most-cited articles on temporomandibular disorders: A bibliometric analysis
Ferrillo, M., Gallo, V., Lippi, L., Bruni, A., Montrella, R., Curci, C., Calafiore, D., Invernizzi, M., Migliario, M., & Alessandro de, S. I. R. E. (2022) · Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · doi:10.3233/bmr-220152 · Cited by 19
Bast, A., Semen, K. O., & Drent, M. (2021) · Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine · doi:10.1097/mcp.0000000000000777 · Cited by 19
Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology
Nagy, T., Hergert, J., Elsherif, M. M., Wallrich, L., Schmidt, K., Waltzer, T., Payne, J. W., Gjoneska, B., Seetahul, Y., Wang, Y. A., et al. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251348431 · Cited by 31
Through the quality kaleidoscope: reflections on research in dentomaxillofacial imaging
Rohlin, M., Horner, K., Lindh, C., & Wenzel, A. (2020) · Dentomaxillofacial Radiology · doi:10.1259/dmfr.20190484 · Cited by 19
Significance and implications of accurate and proper citations in clinical research studies
Ngatuvai, M., Autrey, C., McKenny, M., & Elkbuli, A. (2021) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102841 · Cited by 26
Highly cited educational technology journal articles: a descriptive and critical analysis
Mertala, P., Moens, E., & Teräs, M. (2022) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2022.2141253 · Cited by 22
Questionable Research Practices
O’Boyle, E. H., & Götz, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0010 · Cited by 21
Scientific integrity and fraud in radiology research
Kwee, R. M., Almaghrabi, M. T., & Kwee, T. C. (2022) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110553 · Cited by 17
A good idea or just an idea: Which adaptation strategies for conservation are tested?
Hansen, L. J., Braddock, K. N., & Rudnick, D. A. (2023) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110276 · Cited by 16
Lajus, D., Головин, П. В., Yurtseva, A., Иванова, Т. С., Dorgham, A. S., & Иванов, М. В. (2019) · Evolutionary ecology research · Cited by 15
Krivzov, J., Notaerts, L., Nieuwenhove, K. V., Meganck, R., Truijens, F. L., & Goossens, A. (2021) · European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling · doi:10.1080/13642537.2021.1923051 · Cited by 14
Xie, S., & Mi, C. (2023) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1515 · Cited by 15
Christl, H., Morilla, J., Hoen, T., & Zumkier, U. (2019) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.4115 · Cited by 13
Salandra, R., Criscuolo, P., & Salter, A. J. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104130 · Cited by 15
Perski, O., Simons, D., Shahab, L., & Brown, J. (2021) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntab214 · Cited by 14
Treanor, L. M., Frank, R. A., Salameh, J., Sharifabadi, A. D., McGrath, T. A., Kraaijpoel, N., Bossuyt, P. M., & McInnes, M. D. F. (2019) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.18.20977 · Cited by 13
Resilience Metrics for Socio-Ecological and Socio-Technical Systems: A Scoping Review
Steinmann, P., Tobi, H., & van Voorn, G. A. K. (2024) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems12090357 · Cited by 13
Overcoming citation bias is necessary for true inclusivity in Plant Science
Pandey, S., & Burch‐Smith, T. M. (2023) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koad248 · Cited by 11
Duyx, B., Urlings, M. J. E., Swaen, G. M. H., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026518 · Cited by 11
Self-citationCitation bias in the literature on dietary trans fatty acids and serum cholesterol
Urlings, M. J. E., Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M. H., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.008 · Cited by 11
Self-citationDini, C., Pereira, M. M. A., Souza, J. G. S., Shibli, J. A., de Avila, E. D., & Barão, V. A. R. (2022) · Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · doi:10.1111/cid.13065 · Cited by 9
Dewig, H., Cohen, J. N., Renaghan, E., Leary, M. E., Leary, B. K., Au, J. S., & Tenan, M. S. (2024) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-024-02066-5 · Cited by 10
Uttley, L., Falzon, L., Byrne, J. A., Tricco, A. C., Munafo, M. R., Moher, D., Stoeger, T., Matandika, L., Labbé, C., & Naudet, F. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111616 · Cited by 13
Citation culture: Citing authors behaviour vs trust in research results
Тихонова, Е. В., & Kirillova, O. V. (2023) · Science Editor and Publisher · doi:10.24069/sep-22-58 · Cited by 12
The Value of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Surgery
Knight, S. R. (2021) · European Surgical Research · doi:10.1159/000519593 · Cited by 10
Wu, X., Yan, Q., Riley, P., Hua, F., Shi, B., Glenny, A., & Tu, Y. (2020) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/clr.13620 · Cited by 10
Brown, A. C., Ross, P. P., Brown, S. M., & Mulcahey, M. K. (2021) · Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.013 · Cited by 9
Is the Psychopathic Brain an Artifact of Coding Bias? A Systematic Review
Jalava, J., Griffiths, S. Y., Larsen, R. R., & Alcott, B. E. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654336 · Cited by 11
Investigating and Dealing with Publication Bias and Other Reporting Biases
Page, M. J., Sterne, J. A. C., Higgins, J. P. T., & Egger, M. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119099369.ch5 · Cited by 9
Magama, N., Ojemaye, M. O., Manene, N. C., Okoh, O. O., & Okoh, A. I. (2024) · Ionics · doi:10.1007/s11581-024-05666-3 · Cited by 8
Movahed, F., Hosseini, F. H., Heidari, A., Dehbozorgi, M., Ataei, M., Vahidi, F., Abyaneh, R., Bajelan, B., Bakhtiyari, M., & Shafiee, A. (2025) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102825 · Cited by 8
Mapping Orthopedic Research Trends in Nepal (2000-2024): A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Study
Regmi, A., & Niraula, B. B. (2025) · Indian Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/s43465-025-01528-w · Cited by 8
Positive Outcome Bias in the Influential Otolaryngology Clinical Trial Literature
Yang, H., Tsai, M., Mukdad, L. A., & John, M. A. S. (2023) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/ohn.562 · Cited by 8
Duyx, B., Urlings, M. J. E., Swaen, G. M. H., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2017) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-017-0041-z · Cited by 8
Self-citationSystematic review of biological therapies for atrial fibrillation
McRae, C., Kapoor, A., Kanda, P., Hibbert, B. M., & Davis, D. R. (2019) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.021 · Cited by 8
Packer, M. (2019) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.119.013779 · Cited by 7
Der Testungseffekt beim Lernen mit Texten
Rummer, R. (2021) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000518 · Cited by 8
An Introduction to Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Rao, S. C. (2023) · APIK Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.4103/ajim.ajim_36_23 · Cited by 8
Spin in randomized controlled trials of pharmacology in COVID-19: A systematic review
Oh, Y.-K., Jung, Y.-J., Purja, S., Kim, M., Yon, D. K., Lee, S. W., Cho, K., Koyanagi, A., Dai, Z., Smith, L., et al. (2023) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2269083 · Cited by 10
POSITIVE RESULTS BIAS AND IMPACT FACTOR IN RETINA CLINICAL TRIALS 2016 to 2019
Parikh, A., Markle, J. C., Venincasa, M. J., Kuriyan, A. E., Patel, M. M., & Sridhar, J. S. (2021) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000003107 · Cited by 7
Christl, H., Hoen, T., & Zumkier, U. (2019) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.4218 · Cited by 7
What do analyses of city size distributions have in common?
Cottineau, C. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04256-8 · Cited by 7
Engidaw, A. E., Zou, W., Ning, J., Francesco, G., & Hanchen, J. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251321357 · Cited by 6
Zhang, L., Banihashemi, S., Zhang, Y., & Chen, S. (2025) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2025.100181 · Cited by 6
Pattinson, D., & Currie, G. (2025) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.2012 · Cited by 21
Reflections and practices of citing papers in health care science -a focus group study
Herling, S. F., Jespersen, K. F., & Møller, A. M. (2021) · Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning · doi:10.18261/issn.1892-2021-03-06 · Cited by 6
Impact of podcasting on novel and conventional measures of academic impact
Levin, G., Harrison, R. F., Meyer, R., & Ramirez, P. T. (2023) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2022-004114 · Cited by 6
Schweinsberg, M., Thau, S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221144990 · Cited by 6
Sorjonen, K., Ghaderi, A., & Bo, M.-L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1463701 · Cited by 5
Evaluation of “Spin” in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trial Reports in Cardiology
Roberts, W., Cooper, C. M., Khattab, M., Neff, P., Wildes, D. E., Wayant, C., & Vassar, M. B. (2020) · Journal of Osteopathic Medicine · doi:10.7556/jaoa.2020.133 · Cited by 6
Misleading with citation statistics?
Bennet, L., Eisner, D. A., & Gunn, A. J. (2019) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp277847 · Cited by 6
Yu, H. W. (2021) · The Journal of Antibiotics · doi:10.1038/s41429-021-00439-w · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Duyx, B., Urlings, M. J. E., Swaen, G. M. H., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Duyx, Bram
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- 92-101
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2623032108
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Chemical Industry Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- citation bias, publication bias, positive results, non-significant results, scientific citations, journal impact factor, hypothesis confirmation, scientific disciplines
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Publication Bias, Journal Impact Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review