Cited by 313Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Cholesterol lowering trials in coronary heart disease: Frequency of citation and outcome.

Open access
Ravnskov, U.·1992·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To see if the claim that lowering cholesterol values prevents coronary heart disease is true or if it is based on citation of supportive trials only. DESIGN: Comparison of frequency of citation with outcome of all controlled cholesterol lowering trials using coronary heart disease or death, or both, as end point. SUBJECTS: 22 controlled cholesterol lowering trials. RESULTS: Trials considered by their directors as supportive of the contention were cited almost six times more often than others, according to Science Citation Index. Apart from trials discontinued because of alleged side effects of treatment, unsupportive trials were not cited after 1970, although their number almost equalled the number considered supportive. In three supportive reviews the outcome of the selected trials was more favourable than the outcome of the excluded and ignored trials. In the 22 controlled cholesterol lowering trials studied total and coronary heart disease mortality was not changed significantly either overall or in any subgroup. A statistically significant 0.32% reduction in non-fatal coronary heart disease seemed to be due to bias as event frequencies were unrelated to trial length and to mean net reduction in cholesterol value; individual changes in cholesterol values were unsystematically or not related to outcome; and after correction for a small but significant increase in non-medical deaths in the intervention groups total mortality remained unchanged (odds ratio 1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Lowering serum cholesterol concentrations does not reduce mortality and is unlikely to prevent coronary heart disease. Claims of the opposite are based on preferential citation of supportive trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.305.6844.15

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. on 13 August 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://www.bmj.com/ BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.305.6844.15 on 4 July 1992. Downloaded from I Gotto AM, LaRosa JC, Hunninghake D, Grundy SM, Wilson PW, Clarkson TB, et al. The cholesterol facts. A summary of the evidence relating dietary fats, serum cholesterol, and coronary heart disease. Circulation 1990;81: 1721-33. · DOI
  2. Stamler J, Pick R, Katz LN, Pick A, Kaplan BM, Berkson DM, et al. Effectiveness of estrogens for therapy of myocardial infarction in middle-age men.JAMA 1%3;183:632-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ravnskov, U.
Corresponding author
Ravnskov, U.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1992-07-04
Volume
305
Issue
6844
Pages
15-19
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2024674799
Cited by
313
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
FWCI
50.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
cholesterol lowering, coronary artery disease, serum cholesterol, mortality, citation bias, trial outcomes, statins
MeSH terms
Choice Behavior, Cholesterol, Clinical Trials as Topic, Coronary Disease, Humans, Time Factors, Writing, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review