Cited by 69Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsCommunication in Education and Healthcare

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of virtual reality and in vivo exposure therapy as psychological interventions for public speaking anxiety

Open access
Reeves, Rachel, Curran, David, Gleeson, Amanda, Hanna, Donncha·2022·Behavior Modification

Abstract

Public speaking anxiety (PSA) is a prevalent condition with disabling occupational, educational, and social consequences. Exposure therapy is a commonly utilized approach for treating PSA. Traditionally, this intervention has been delivered as in vivo exposure therapy (IVET). Limitations inherent to in vivo as a mode of delivery have been identified and studies have increasingly explored the use of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) as an alternative. Understanding the efficacy of both VRET and IVET as psychological interventions for PSA is important. A systematic search identified 11 studies with 508 participants. Meta-analysis yielded a large significant effect wherein VRET resulted in significant reductions in PSA versus control of −1.39 ( Z = 3.96, p < .001) and a similar large significant effect wherein IVET resulted in significant reductions in PSA versus control of −1.41 ( Z = 7.51, p < .001). Although IVET was marginally superior to VRET, both interventions proved efficacious. Given the advantages of utilizing VRET over IVET future research and clinical practice could explore VRET as a treatment option for PSA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445521991102

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VRET demonstrates comparable efficacy to traditional in vivo exposure for SAD and PSA.

    “VRET demonstrates comparable efficacy to traditional in vivo exposure.”

    From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Reeves et al., 2022

    The Discussion says VRET was “not substantially inferior” to in vivo exposure therapy for public speaking anxiety (PSA), while the Conclusion says in vivo exposure was marginally more efficacious. The Future Directions section says whether treatment targeting PSA reduces broader social anxiety was beyond this meta-analysis’s scope, so the added claim about SAD is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent meta-analyses show that VRET for SAD has significant and enduring effect sizes (Hedges' g ranging from −0.86 to −1.14) over follow-up periods of up to 12 months.

    “Recent meta-analyses (Carl et al., 2019; Reeves et al., 2022; Morina et al., 2023; van Loenen et al., 2022; Horigome et al., 2020; Kampmann et al., 2016a) underscore the efficacy of conducting VRET for SAD with significant and enduring effect sizes (Hedges' g ranging from −0.86 to −1.14) over follow-up periods of up to 12 months.”

    From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Reeves et al., 2022

    The Results (Analysis 1: VRET versus Control Conditions; page unavailable) report a significant post-treatment reduction in public speaking anxiety, with a pooled effect of −1.39. That does not establish the stated Hedges’ g range for SAD generally. The Limitations explicitly say no follow-up analysis was conducted, so this paper does not support enduring effects over up to 12 months. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Meta-analyses estimate large effect sizes for VRET compared to waitlist control conditions (Hedge's g between 0.86 and 1.46) for SAD and PSA, and moderate to large effect sizes (Hedge's g between 0.49 and 0.78) for anxiety disorders in general.

    “Effect sizes for VRET compared to waitlist control conditions are estimated to be large (Hedge's g between 0.86 and 1.46) for SAD (Reeves et al., 2022; Morina et al., 2023; Horigome et al., 2020; Kampmann et al., 2016a) and PSA (Reeves et al., 2022), and moderate to large (Hedge's g between 0.49 and 0.78) for anxiety disorders in general (Carl et al., 2019; van Loenen et al., 2022).”

    From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Reeves et al., 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exposure-based interventions addressing social fears can be resource-intensive and time-consuming.

    “Exposure-based interventions addressing social fears can be resource-intensive and time-consuming due to the need to facilitate exposure exercises often outside the safety of a standardized, closely measured and accompanied environment (Reeves et al., 2022; Bouchard et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. The Cochrane Collaboration. (2014). Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] (Version 5.3). The Nordic Cochrane Centre.
  2. Leary M. R. Kowalski R. M. (1997). Social anxiety. Guilford Press.
  3. Lister H. A. Piercey C. D. Joordens C. (2010). The effectiveness of 3-D video virtual reality for the treatment of fear of public speaking. Journal of Cyber Therapy and Rehabilitation, 3(4), 375– 381. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79960359620&partnerID=40&md5=a5fe8e42ae54ec8f46e1272ef96a3748
  4. Motley M. T. (1995). Overcoming your fear of public speaking. McGraw-Hill.
  5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). Social anxiety disorder: Recognition, assessment and treatment (Guideline No. CG159). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG159 31869048
  6. *North M. M. North M. M. Coble J. R. (1998). Virtual reality therapy: An effective treatment for the fear of public speaking. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 3(3), 2– 7.
  7. Reeves R. Curran D. Gleeson A. Hanna D. (2019). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Virtual Reality and in-vivo exposure therapy as psychological interventions for Public Speaking Anxiety. PROSPERO: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019132587). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=132587 PMC9158252 33533265
  8. Spielberger C. D. Gorsuch R. L. Lushene R. E. (1970). STAI manual for the Stait-Trait Anxiety Inventory (“self-evaluation questionnaire”). Consulting Psychologists Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reeves, R., Curran, D., Gleeson, A., & Hanna, D.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Hanna, Donncha
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2021-02-03
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
937-965
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W3128823880
Cited by
69
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
public speaking anxiety, virtual reality exposure therapy, in vivo exposure therapy, psychological intervention, speaking anxiety, treatment comparison
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Psychosocial Intervention, Anxiety, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Speech, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review