CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overview of evidence synthesis types and modes

Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara, Booth, Andrew, Garritty, Chantelle, Hamel, Candyce, Munn, Zachary, Tricco, Andrea C., Pollock, Danielle·2025·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111970
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111970

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure. Evidence synthesis family.
Figure. Evidence synthesis family.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Garritty, 2019, Knowledge synthesis in evidence-based medicine, Semin Nucl Med, 49, 136, 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.11.006 · DOI
  2. Sackett, 1996, Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't, BMJ, 312, 71, 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sutton, 2019, Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements, Health Inf Libr J, 36, 202, 10.1111/hir.12276 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Munn, 2023, The pandora’s box of evidence synthesis and the case for a living evidence synthesis taxonomy, BMJ Evid Based Med, 28, 148, 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112065 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—Grade evidence profiles and summary of findings tables, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 383, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Beecher, 2022, Priority III: top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities identified using a James Lind alliance priority setting partnership, J Clin Epidemiol, 151, 151, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.002 · DOI
  7. Garritty, 2024, Updated recommendations for the cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness, BMJ, 384, 10.1136/bmj-2023-076335 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Booth, 2024, Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis, BMJ Evid Based Med, 29, 194, 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620 · DOI
  9. Campbell, 2025, Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid scoping, mapping and evidence and gap map (‘Big Picture Reviews’), BMJ Evid Based Med, 30, 268
  10. Tricco, 2022, Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement, JBI Evid Synth, 20, 944, 10.11124/JBIES-21-00371 · DOI
  11. Munn, 2023, The dark side of rapid reviews: a retreat from systematic approaches and the need for clear expectations and reporting, Ann Intern Med, 176, 266, 10.7326/M22-2603 · DOI
  12. Elliott, 2017, Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—The why, what, when, and how, J Clin Epidemiol, 91, 23, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Carmona, 2023, The move towards living systematic reviews and living guidelines in healthcare: consideration of the possibilities and challenges for living qualitative evidence syntheses, Syst Rev, 12, 47, 10.1186/s13643-023-02218-0 · DOI
  14. Elliott, 2021, Decision makers need 'living' evidence synthesis, Nature, 600, 383, 10.1038/d41586-021-03690-1 · DOI
  15. Flemming, 2021, Qualitative evidence synthesis: where are we at?, Int J Qual Methods, 20, 10.1177/1609406921993276 · DOI
  16. Stern, 2021, Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews, JBI Evid Implement, 19, 120, 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000282 · DOI
  17. Stern, 2020, Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews, JBI Evid Synth, 18, 2108, 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169 · DOI
  18. Campbell, 2023, Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family, Syst Rev, 12, 45, 10.1186/s13643-023-02178-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Munn, 2022, What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis, JBI Evid Synth, 20, 950, 10.11124/JBIES-21-00483 · DOI · Paper page
  20. James, 2016, A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences, Environ Evid, 5, 7, 10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. White, 2020, Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map, Campbell Syst Rev, 16
  22. Nussbaumer-Streit, 2020, Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9
  23. Iannizzi, 2023, Convalescent plasma for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2
  24. Nussbaumer-Streit, 2019, Light therapy for preventing seasonal affective disorder, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3
  25. van Deuren, 2020, Severe fatigue after treatment for childhood cancer, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3
  26. Beishon, 2022, Diagnostic test accuracy of remote, multidomain cognitive assessment (telephone and video call) for dementia, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4
  27. Hayden, 2019, Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019
  28. Todhunter-Brown, 2022, Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an overview of cochrane systematic reviews, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9
  29. Harris, 2019, School-based self-management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1
  30. Houghton, 2020, Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10
  31. Andreas, 2022, Interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8
  32. Amog, 2022, The web-based “Right Review” tool asks reviewers simple questions to suggest methods from 41 knowledge synthesis methods, J Clin Epidemiol, 147, 42, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Booth, A., Garritty, C., Hamel, C., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Pollock, D.
ORCID
Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
187
Pages
111970
ISSN
0895-4356
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111970
Cited by
19
References
7
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • University for Continuing Education Krems
  • NÖ Gesundheits- und Sozialfonds
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP 1195676)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of evidence synthesis types and modes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111970
The paper
Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Booth, A., Garritty, C., Hamel, C., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Pollock, D. (2025). Overview of evidence synthesis types and modes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111970