Cited by 655Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in Research

Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how

Open access
Elliott, Julian H., Synnot, Anneliese, Turner, Tari, Simmonds, Mark, Akl, Elie A., McDonald, Steve, Salanti, Georgia, Meerpohl, Joerg +136 more·2017·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review currency, accuracy, and utility. We are developing a novel approach to systematic review updating termed "Living systematic review" (LSR): systematic reviews that are continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. LSRs may be particularly important in fields where research evidence is emerging rapidly, current evidence is uncertain, and new research may change policy or practice decisions. We hypothesize that a continual approach to updating will achieve greater currency and validity, and increase the benefits to end users, with feasible resource requirements over time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Institute of Medicine. In: Eden J, et al, editors. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington, DC: Na- tional Acadamies Press; 2011.
  2. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of in- terventions. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
  3. Living Systematic Review Network. Cochrane living systematic reviews: interim guidance for pilots (Version 0.3, 21 April 2017). London, UK: Cochrane; 2017. Available at http://community. cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/inline-files/Transform/LSR Interim guidance_v0.3_20170421.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliott, J. H., Synnot, A., Turner, T., Simmonds, M., Akl, E. A., McDonald, S., Salanti, G., Meerpohl, J., MacLehose, H., Hilton, J., Tovey, D., Shemilt, I., Thomas, J., Agoritsas, T., Hilton, J., Perron, C., Akl, E., Hodder, R., Pestridge, C., Albrecht, L., Horsley, T., Platt, J., Armstrong, R., Nguyen, P. H., Plovnick, R., Arno, A., Ivers, N., Quinn, G., Au, A., Johnston, R., Rada, G., Bagg, M., Jones, A., Ravaud, P., Boden, C., Kahale, L., Richter, B., Boisvert, I., Keshavarz, H., Ryan, R., Brandt, L., Kolakowsky-Hayner, S. A., Salama, D., Brazinova, A., Nagraj, S. K., Salanti, G., Buchbinder, R., Lasserson, T., Santaguida, L., Champion, C., Lawrence, R., Santesso, N., Chandler, J., Les, Z., Schünemann, H. J., Charidimou, A., Leucht, S., Shemilt, I., Chou, R., Low, N., Sherifali, D., Churchill, R., Maas, A., Siemieniuk, R., Cnossen, M. C., MacLehose, H., Simmonds, M., Cossi, M.-J., Macleod, M., Skoetz, N., Counotte, M., Marshall, I., Soares-Weiser, K., Craigie, S., Marshall, R., Srikanth, V., Dahm, P., Martin, N., Sullivan, K., Danilkewich, A., Martínez García, L., Synnot, A., Danko, K., Mavergames, C., Taylor, M., Donoghue, E., Maxwell, L. J., Thayer, K., Dressler, C., McAuley, J., Thomas, J., Egan, C., McDonald, S., Tritton, R., Elliott, J., McKenzie, J., Tsafnat, G., Elliott, S. A., Meerpohl, J., Tugwell, P., Etxeandia, I., Merner, B., Turgeon, A., Featherstone, R., Mondello, S., Turner, T., Foxlee, R., Morley, R., van Valkenhoef, G., Garner, P., Munafo, M., Vandvik, P., Gerrity, M., Munn, Z., Wallace, B., Glasziou, P., Murano, M., Wallace, S. A., Green, S., Newman, K., Watts, C., Grimshaw, J., Nieuwlaat, R., Weeks, L., Gurusamy, K., Nikolakopoulou, A., Weigl, A., Haddaway, N., Noel-Storr, A., Wells, G., Hartling, L., O'Connor, A., Wiercioch, W., Hayden, J., Page, M., Wolfenden, L., Helfand, M., Pahwa, M., Yepes Nuñez, J. J., Higgins, J., Pardo, J. P., Yost, J., Hill, S., & Pearson, L.
Affiliations
  • Cochrane Canada (CA)
  • University College London (GB)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • University of York (GB)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
91
Pages
23-30
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754736027
Cited by
655
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 9
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC/L000970/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/J005037/1, MR/N015665/1)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1114605)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
living systematic review, systematic review updating, evidence updating
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Humans, Time Factors, Guidelines as Topic, Access to Information, Information Dissemination, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review