Cited by 23Coconut Research and ApplicationsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesDiet and metabolism studies

The clinical use of monolaurin as a dietary supplement: a review of the literature.

Open access
Barker, Lisa A., Bakkum, Barclay W., Chapman, Cynthia·2019·Journal of Chiropractic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine what the peer-reviewed literature says about the clinical applications, therapeutic dosages, bioavailability, efficacy, and safety of monolaurin as a dietary supplement. METHODS: This was a narrative review using the PubMed database and the terms "monolaurin" and its chemical synonyms. Commercial websites that sell monolaurin were also searched for pertinent references. The reference sections of the newer articles were searched for any other relevant articles. Consensus was reached among the authors as to what articles had clinical relevance. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles were found that appeared to address the clinical use of monolaurin. CONCLUSION: There are many articles that address the antimicrobial effects of monolaurin in vitro. Only 3 peer-reviewed papers that evidence in vivo antimicrobial effects of monolaurin in humans were located, and these were only for intravaginal and intraoral-that is, topical-use. No peer-reviewed evidence was found for the clinical use of monolaurin as a human dietary supplement other than as a nutrient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcm.2019.02.004

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are many articles on the antimicrobial effects of glycerol monolaurate in vitro and in vivo in animal studies, but only three papers highlight in vivo antimicrobial effects in humans.

    “There are many articles on the antimicrobial effects of GML in vitro and in vivo in animal studies but only three papers highlight in vivo antimicrobial effects in humans (Barker et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barker, L. A., Bakkum, B. W., & Chapman, C.
Affiliations
Illinois College of Optometry (US)
Corresponding author
Bakkum, Barclay W.
Venue
Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
Published
2019-12
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
305-310
ISSN
1556-3707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3083329898
Cited by
23
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chiropractic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
monolaurin, dietary supplements, antimicrobial activity, bioavailability, therapeutic dose, safety, topical application, clinical efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review