Cited by 160Coconut Research and ApplicationsEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityAntimicrobial agents and applications

A Review of Monolaurin and Lauric Acid: Natural Virucidal and Bactericidal Agents

Lieberman, Shari, Enig, Mary G., Preuss, Harry G.·2006·Alternative and Complementary Therapies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/act.2006.12.310

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lieberman, S., Enig, M. G., & Preuss, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Seneca Falls, New York.
  • Enig Associates (United States) (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Alternative and Complementary Therapies
Published
2006-12
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
310-314
ISSN
  • 1076-2809 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9085
OpenAlex
W2032639028
Cited by
153
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Alternative and Complementary Therapies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
monolaurin, lauric acid, virucidal agents, bactericides, natural antimicrobials, antiviral activity, antibacterial activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review